Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling · 2008 · 108 citations · 45 references
PharmacyMedicinal ChemistryComputational ChemistryDrug DiscoveryPharmacophore ModelingChemical Space ExplorationConformational AnalysisConformational SamplingLigand-based DesignMolecular DockingPharmacophore Screening3D Pharmacophore SearchBioactive Conformation SelectionBioactive Conformer SelectionChemical Library EnumerationHigh-throughput Library ConstructionHigh-throughput Screening Library DesignLibrary EnumerationLigand Conformational Sampling
Computational conformational sampling is integral to small molecule pharmaceutical research, for detailed conformational analysis and high-throughput 3D library enumeration. These two regimes were tested in details for the general-purpose modeling program MOE, using its three conformational sampling methods, i.e. systematic search, stochastic search, and Conformation Import. The tests include i) identification of the global energy minimum, ii) reproduction of the bioactive conformation, iii) measures of conformational coverage with 3D descriptors, and iv) compute times. The bioactive conformers are from a new set of 256 diverse, druglike, protein-bound ligands compiled and analyzed with particular care. The MOE results are compared to those obtained from the established program Catalyst. Key parameters controlling the conformational coverage were varied systematically. Coverage and diversity of the conformational space were characterized with unique pharmacophore triplets or quadruplets. Overall, the protocols in both MOE and Catalyst performed well for their intended tasks. MOE performed at least as well as Catalyst for high-throughput library generation and detailed conformational modeling. This work provides a guide and specific recommendations regarding the usage of conformational sampling tools in MOE.
45
Helen M. Berman · Nucleic Acids Research · 2000 · 39.8K citations
Development and testing of a general amber force field
Junmei Wang, Romain M. Wolf, James W. Caldwell et al. · Journal of Computational Chemistry · 2004 · 19.6K citations