The Disjunctive Fallacy between Discrete-Point and Integrative Tests

Abstract

This article presents evidence of underlying similarities between discretepoint and integrative tests and questions the validity of special claims for distinguishing one from the other. The procedures followed are 1) to give a brief historical account of the development of the tests in question, 2) to present statistical evidence for the similarities between the two types of tests, 3) to discuss the potential variables which may influence test results and create test bias, 4) to consider the applications of the findings to areas such as placement and language acquisition tests, and 5) to suggest some guidelines in order to avoid making unfair decisions on the basis of test scores.