Publication | Closed Access
Status updates through queues
471
Citations
12
References
2012
Year
Unknown Venue
EngineeringEdge ComputingLcfs SystemsNetwork Traffic ControlCloud ComputingPerformance ModelingNetwork CalculusPoisson SourceProbability TheoryInternet Of ThingsAdvanced NetworkingQueueing TheoryNetwork ConnectivityQueueing Systems
Network connectivity and portable sensing devices enable applications where sources send status updates (e.g., location) to recipients, but timely delivery is limited by scarce network resources. This paper investigates the performance of status update systems using a time‑averaged age metric, focusing on last‑come‑first‑served (LCFS) queue disciplines rather than FCFS. The authors model the system as a source, service facility, and monitors, derive a general expression for age under LCFS queues with and without preemption, and solve for the average age of a Poisson source with memoryless service, including analysis of shared service when preemption is allowed.
Anytime, anywhere network connectivity, together with portable sensing and computing devices have led to applications in which sources, for example people or environmental sensors, send updates of their status, for example location, to interested recipients, say a location service. These applications desire status updates at the recipients to be as timely as possible; however, this is typically constrained by limited network resources. We employ a time-averaged age metric for characterizing performance of such status update systems. We use system abstractions consisting of a source, a service facility and monitors, with the model of the service facility (physical constraints) a given. While prior work examined first-come-first-served (FCFS) queues, this paper looks at the queue discipline of last-come-first-served (LCFS). We explore LCFS systems with and without the ability to preempt the packet currently in service. For each we derive a general expression for system age and solve for the average age a Poisson source can achieve given memoryless service. Specifically, when preemption is allowed, we evaluate how the source would share the service facility with other independent Poisson sources.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1