Bootstrap Confidence Regions Computed from Autoregressions of Arbitrary Order

Edwin Choi, Peter Hall

Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · 2000 · 89 citations · 25 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Let's collect: Other: "Summary Given a linear time series, e.g." That's the only sentence with Other. It seems like a summary line but maybe just a placeholder. The content: "Summary Given a linear time series, e.g." Not much. Could be "Summary: Given a linear time series, e.g." But that is incomplete. Maybe we can say "Summary: Given a linear time series, e.g." But still incomplete.

Abstract

Summary Given a linear time series, e.g. an autoregression of infinite order, we may construct a finite order approximation and use that as the basis for confidence regions. The sieve or autoregressive bootstrap, as this method is often called, is generally seen as a competitor with the better-understood block bootstrap approach. However, in the present paper we argue that, for linear time series, the sieve bootstrap has significantly better performance than blocking methods and offers a wider range of opportunities. In particular, since it does not corrupt second-order properties then it may be used in a double-bootstrap form, with the second bootstrap application being employed to calibrate a basic percentile method confidence interval. This approach confers second-order accuracy without the need to estimate variance. That offers substantial benefits, since variances of statistics based on time series can be difficult to estimate reliably, and—partly because of the relatively small amount of information contained in a dependent process—are notorious for causing problems when used to Studentize. Other advantages of the sieve bootstrap include considerably greater robustness against variations in the choice of the tuning parameter, here equal to the autoregressive order, and the fact that, in contradistinction to the case of the block bootstrap, the percentile t version of the sieve bootstrap may be based on the ‘raw'’ estimator of standard error. In the process of establishing these properties we show that the sieve bootstrap is second order correct.

References

25