Journal of Clinical Child Psychology · 2000 · 102 citations · 9 references
Social SciencesBehavioral SciencesPsychologyDevelopmental PsychologyDevelopmental PsychopathologyPsychometricsChild PsychopathologyConduct DisorderFactor AnalysisOppositional Defiant DisorderProblem BehaviorPsychological TestingDefiant BehaviorFactor Model SpecificationItem Factor Analysis
Used the Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory (ECBI) to measure disruptive behavior problems in children and adolescents. A controversy exists, however, on the dimensional structure of the ECBI. To evaluate this issue, an exploratory factor analysis was first performed on a sample of 1,263 children and adolescents. This analysis identified 3 meaningful factors (i.e., Oppositional Defiant Behavior Toward Adults, Inattentive Behavior and Conduct Problem Behavior) and a fourth, poorly defined factor. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) evaluated the fit of the 3 meaningful factors in a second sample of 1,264 children and adolescents. The 3-factor model with 2 correlated errors provided a excellent fit. This 3-factor model also provided a significantly better fit than 2- and 1-factor models. Multiple group CFA indicated that the factor pattern, item-factor loadings, factor correlations, and correlated errors were equivalent across the samples. The CFA on sex yielded similar results. Initial normative information is presented for boys (n = 1,322) and girls (n = 1,205) within 4 age ranges (i.e., 2-5, 6-9, 10-13, 14-17) for the 3 factors. The use of these 3 factors, especially Oppositional Defiant Behavior and Conduct Problem Behavior, should make the ECBI more useful as a screening and outcome measure.
9
G. Leonard Burns, James A. Walsh, David R. Patterson et al. · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · 1997 · 77 citations