Tissue Engineering Part A · 2010 · 47 citations · 6 references
ManagementBioengineeringBiomedical EngineeringRegenerative MedicineTechnology CommercializationTissue EngineeringCommercialization StrategyInnovation CommercializationProduct DevelopmentResearch CommercializationCommercialization MetricsProduct Development ProcessTechnology Commercialization Governance
The study seeks to identify and address common roadblocks in the commercialization of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine products by surveying members of TERMIS‑NA. A semiquantitative online survey was developed and distributed to 863 TERMIS‑NA members over five weeks to capture perceptions of commercialization hurdles across academia, startups, development‑stage, and established companies. Responses from 215 members (25%) revealed the most difficult and easiest hurdles for each group, highlighted gaps in cross‑group understanding, and emphasized the need for enhanced communication to support product development.
The Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine International Society-North America (TERMIS-NA) Industry Committee was formed in February 2009 to address the common roadblocks (i.e., hurdles) in the commercialization of tissue engineering/regenerative medicine products for its members. A semiquantitative online opinion survey instrument that delineated potentially sensitive hurdles to commercialization in each of the TERMIS constituency groups that generally participate in the stream of technology commercialization (academia, startup companies, development-stage companies, and established companies) was developed. The survey was opened to each of the 863 members of TERMIS-NA for a period of 5 weeks from October to November 2009. By its conclusion, 215 members (25%) had responded. Their proportionate numbers were closely representative of TERMIS-NA constituencies. The resulting data delineate what each group considers to be its most difficult and also its easiest hurdles in taking a technology to full product development. In addition, each group ranked its perception of the difficult and easy hurdles for all other groups, enabling an assessment of the degree of understanding between groups. The data depict not only critical hurdles in the path to commercialization at each stage in product development but also a variable understanding of perceptions of hurdles between groups. This assessment has provided the Industry Committee with activity foci needed to assist individual groups in the technology-commercialization stream. Moreover, the analysis suggests that enhanced communication between groups engaged in commercialization will be critical to the successful development of products in the tissue engineering/regenerative medicine sector.
6
Strategic Directions in Tissue Engineering
Peter C. Johnson, Antonios G. Mikos, John P. Fisher et al. · Tissue Engineering · 2007 · 155 citations