European Journal of Dentistry · 2014 · 79 citations · 30 references
DentistryMaterials EngineeringMaterials ScienceCeramic MaterialsCeramicsDental MaterialsAdhesive BondingAll-ceramic RestorationsCeramic RestorationsCeramic Surface TreatmentDental CeramicsRepair Of Esthetic RestorationsBondingBonding Protocols For RepairCad And Cam Ceramic RestorationsRepair Of Ceramic RestorationsRestorative MaterialsSilane Application In RepairSilane CoatingSilanization
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the repair potential of CAD/CAM (computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing) ceramic and composite blocks using a silane-containing bonding agent with different repair protocols. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four discs were constructed from CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. The discs were divided into six groups according to surface pre-treatment employed; GI: Diamond stone roughening (SR), GII: SR+ silanization (SR+S), GIII: Hydrofluoric acid etching (HF), GIV: HF+ silanization (HF+S), GV: Silica coating (SC), GVI: SC+ silanization (SC+S). Silane-containing bonding agent (Single Bond Universal adhesive, 3M ESPE) was applied to the pre-treated discs. Prior to light curing, irises were cut from tygon tubes (internal diameter = 0.8 mm and height = 0.5 mm) and mounted on each treated surface. Nanofilled resin composite (Filtek Z350(XT), 3M ESPE) was packed into the cylinder lumen and light-cured (n = 10). The specimens were subjected to microshear bond strength testing (μ-SBS) using universal testing machine. Failure modes of the fractured specimens were analyzed using field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). Eight representative discs were prepared to analyze the effect of surface treatments on surface topography using FESEM. μ-SBS results were analyzed using ANOVA and Tukeys post-hoc test. RESULTS: Three-way ANOVA results showed that the materials, surface pre-treatment protocols, and silanization step had a statistically significant effect on the mean μ-SBS values at P ≤ 0.001. For ceramic discs, the groups were ranked; GIV (24.45 ± 7.35)> GVI ((20.18 ± 2.84)> GV (7.14 ± 14)= GII (6.72 ± 1.91)=GI (6.34 ± 2.21)=GIII (5.72 ± 2.18). For composite discs, groups were ranked; GI (24.98 ± 7.69)=GVI (24.84 ± 7.00) >GII (15.85 ± 5.29) =GV (14.65 ± 4.5)= GIV (14.24 ± 2.95)≥ GIII ((9.37 ± 2.78). CONCLUSION: The additional silanization step cannot be omitted if the repair protocol comprises of either hydrofluoric acid etching or silica coating for both CAD/CAM esthetic restorative materials. However, this step can be suppressed by using silane-containing adhesive with diamond stone roughened repair protocol.
30
Mutlu Özcan, Silvia Helena Pienta Borges Barbosa, Renata Marques de Melo et al. · Dental Materials · 2006 · 273 citations
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +11
Aline Scalone Brentel, Mutlu Özcan, Luiz Felipe Valandro et al. · Dental Materials · 2007 · 197 citations
Natural Sciences, Materials Engineering, Materials Science +17