BMC Urology · 2014 · 71 citations · 25 references
MedicineOncologyUrologyMetastasisSurvival AnalysisTumor ProgressionAndrogen Deprivation TherapyCancer Survival AnalysisMetastatic Disease ManagementMetastatic Disease TreatmentProstate CancerProstate-specific Antigen TestingCastration-resistant Prostate Cancer TherapyGleason ScoringMetastatic Castration-resistant Prostate CancerMultivariable Regression AnalysisOverall MortalityPrognostic Factors AnalysisProstate Cancer MortalityProstate Cancer Prognosis
BACKGROUND: Primary androgen deprivation therapy (PADT) is the most effective systemic therapy for patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Nevertheless, once PSA progression develops, the prognosis is serious and mortal. We sought to identify factors that predicted the prognosis in a series of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: Two-hundred eighty-six metastatic prostate cancer patients who received PADT from 1998 to 2005 in Nara Uro-Oncology Research Group were enrolled. The log-rank test and Cox's proportional hazards model were used to determine the predictive factors for prognosis; rate of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and overall survival. RESULTS: The median age, follow-up period and PSA level at diagnosis were 73 years, 47 months and 174 ng/mL, respectively. The 5-year overall survival rate was 63.0%. The multivariable analysis showed that Gleason score (Hazard ratio [HR]:1.362; 95% confidence interval [C.I.], 1.023-1.813), nadir PSA (HR:6.332; 95% C.I., 4.006-9.861) and time from PADT to nadir (HR:4.408; 95% C.I., 3.099-6.271) were independent prognostic factors of the incidence of CRPC. The independent parameters in the multivariate analysis that predicted overall survival were nadir PSA (HR:5.221; 95% C.I., 2.757-9.889) and time from PADT to nadir (HR:4.008; 95% C.I., 2.137-7.517). CONCLUSIONS: Nadir PSA and time from PADT to nadir were factors that affect both CRPC and overall survival in a cohort of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Lower nadir PSA level and longer time from PADT to nadir were good for survival and progression.
25
TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors
Darryl Carter · The American Journal of Surgical Pathology · 1998 · 6.4K citations
Howard I. Scher, Susan Halabi, Ian F. Tannock et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2008 · 2.2K citations · Full text
Glenn J. Bubley, Michael A. Carducci, William L. Dahut et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 1999 · 984 citations
Ayako Matsuda, Tomohiro Matsuda, Akiko Shibata et al. · Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2014 · 571 citations · Full text