Will water scarcity in semiarid regions limit hydraulic fracturing of shale plays?

Bridget R. Scanlon, R. C. Reedy, Jean-Philippe Nicot

Environmental Research Letters · 2014 · 99 citations · 24 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Water constraints in semiarid shale plays, including limited freshwater supplies, minimal flowback reuse, and increasing brackish groundwater use, raise concerns about hydraulic fracturing viability. The study evaluates hydraulic fracturing vulnerability by comparing water demand and supply in the semiarid Texas Eagle Ford play. The authors assess water demand and supply, noting pumpage has caused 100–200 ft drawdown in 6 % of the western play area since 2009–2013. Hydraulic fracturing in the Eagle Ford consumes about 16 % of local water use, projected demand could reach 330 bgal over 20 years—about 10 % of historic irrigation depletion—and, with brackish groundwater use, water availability should not limit future production.

Abstract

There is increasing concern about water constraints limiting oil and gas production using hydraulic fracturing (HF) in shale plays, particularly in semiarid regions and during droughts. Here we evaluate HF vulnerability by comparing HF water demand with supply in the semiarid Texas Eagle Ford play, the largest shale oil producer globally. Current HF water demand (18 billion gallons, bgal; 68 billion liters, bL in 2013) equates to ∼16% of total water consumption in the play area. Projected HF water demand of ∼330 bgal with ∼62 000 additional wells over the next 20 years equates to ∼10% of historic groundwater depletion from regional irrigation. Estimated potential freshwater supplies include ∼1000 bgal over 20 yr from recharge and ∼10 000 bgal from aquifer storage, with land-owner lease agreements often stipulating purchase of freshwater. However, pumpage has resulted in excessive drawdown locally with estimated declines of ∼100–200 ft in ∼6% of the western play area since HF began in 2009–2013. Non-freshwater sources include initial flowback water, which is ≤5% of HF water demand, limiting reuse/recycling. Operators report shifting to brackish groundwater with estimated groundwater storage of 80 000 bgal. Comparison with other semiarid plays indicates increasing brackish groundwater and produced water use in the Permian Basin and large surface water inputs from the Missouri River in the Bakken play. The variety of water sources in semiarid regions, with projected HF water demand representing ∼3% of fresh and ∼1% of brackish water storage in the Eagle Ford footprint indicates that, with appropriate management, water availability should not physically limit future shale energy production.

References

24