Silva Fennica · 1996 · 59 citations · 0 references
Natural ResourcesEcologyForestryForest ManagementHarvest ManagementSilvicultureForest RegenerationNatural RegenerationRegrowth CapacityTree RegenerationFunctional Species GroupsHarvest Interval EffectsNatural Forest RegenerationNatural Regeneration AssessmentPost-harvest RegenerationRegeneration ResponseRegeneration TreatmentsSpecies Composition Of Regeneration
In a silviculture experiment in east-central Maine, USA, natural regeneration was sampled to measure the effects of: (1) a range of partial harvest intensities, and (2) repeated partial harvest at one intensity. Under the first objective, five treatments were compared with residual basal areas ranging from 15 to 24 m ha for trees â¥1.3 cm diameter at breast height. For the second objective, regeneration was evaluated after four harvests at 5-year intervals. Prior to harvests, the overstory of all the treated stands was dominated by (L.) Carr., spp. A Dietr., and (L.) Mill. Eleven species or species groups were identified among the regeneration: spp., L., spp. L., Marsh., L., Marsh., spp. L., Ehrh. and Ehrh. Regeneration abundance was measured as counts of seedlings or sprouts taller than 15 cm but with diameters less than 1.3 cm at breast height (1.37 m). Regardless of harvest treatment, total regeneration was profuse, ranging from over 25,000 to nearly 80,000 trees ha. Regeneration was dominated by conifers with a total angiosperm component of 10 to 52 percent approximately 5 years after harvest and 11 to 33 percent after 10 years. Consequently, in forests of similar species composition, tree regeneration following partial harvests should be sufficiently abundant with an array of species to meet a variety of future management objectives.2-1Tsuga canadensisPiceaAbies balsameaA. balsamea, T. canadensis, PiceaThuja occidentalisPinusBetula papyriferaAcer rubrumBetula populifoliaPopulusFagus grandifoliaPrunus serotina-1