Nordic Journal of International Law · 2007 · 21 citations · 0 references
LawHuman Rights LawInternational LawHuman RightsInternational OrganizationsPublic International LawEuropean IntegrationEuropean LawEuropean Public PolicyInternational Human Rights LawSanctions LawSanctions RegimesEuropean Human Rights LawEuropean Union Sanctions LawEuropean Union TreatiesInternational Law Of SanctionsSanctionsSanctions AuthoritySanctions ImplementationSecurity Council Resolutions
Abstract This article analyses the way UN sanctions are implemented in the European legal order. As a basis for the analysis, the European Court of First Instance's (CFI) rulings in the Yusuf/Kadi/Ayadi 1 cases and the European Court of Human Rights's (ECrtHR) judgment in the Bosphorus 2 case are applied. The main critique of the author is that the CFI misconstrued the hierarchy of norms within the Community legal order when it argued that the EC/EU (European Community/European Union) is bound by UN Security Council resolutions in the same way as the Member States. Moreover, the conclusion drawn from this by the CFI that UN law enjoys supremacy over primary EC law is also rejected by the author. Finally, it appears that European courts are unwilling to provide judicial review against UN sanctions, which results in a lacuna concerning fundamental rights protection for affected individuals and organisations.