Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition · 2007 · 26 citations · 30 references
EngineeringBioengineeringBiomedical EngineeringNeural EngineeringRegenerative MedicineTissue EngineeringBiomaterials For RegenerationNerve RegenerationNerve RepairNeural RegenerationNeural Tissue EngineeringRegenerative ScaffoldsConduits For Nerve RepairCross-linkingGelatin BiomaterialsGelatin-based BiomaterialsNerve Guidance ConduitsNerve Tissue EngineeringPeripheral Nerve RegenerationSciatic Nerve Repair
We evaluated peripheral nerve regeneration using biodegradable genipin-cross-linked gelatin nerve conduits (GGCs) with three different cross-linking degrees, 24, 36 and 51%. Biocompatibility and biodegradability of the GGC and its efficiency as a guidance channel were examined based on the repair process of a 10-mm gap in the rat sciatic nerve. From this pilot study we concluded that GGCs with a mean cross-linking degree of 36% can ensure nerve regeneration with a more mature structure, as demonstrated by better developed epineural and perineural organisation and axonal development, as well as better-recovered electrophysiology with a relatively positive sciatic functional index and a shorter latency of the muscle action potential curve. Regenerated nerves in the GGCs with mean cross-linking degrees of 24 and 51% were less favourable, due to irritation caused by degradation material and compression by the remaining tube walls, respectively.
30
Wolfgang Friess · European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics · 1998 · 1.1K citations
Natural Sciences, Bioengineering, Biomedical Engineering +16
Stabilization of gelatin films by crosslinking with genipin
Adriana Bigi, G. Cojazzi, Silvia Panzavolta et al. · Biomaterials · 2002 · 625 citations