Peace with justice?: war crimes and accountability in the former Yugoslavia

Abstract

Part 1 Part I: Structuring an Inquiry into the Role of Justice During the Peace-building Process Chapter 2 The Cognitive Contextual Process: Melding International Relations and International Legal Theory Chapter 3 Justice and Anti-Justice: The Functions of Accountability in the Peace-building Process Chapter 4 Peace vs. Justice: The Relationship between Accountability and Other Relevant Peace-building Approaches Part 5 Part II: Precursors to Justice: Self-Identity, Political Will, and Moral Obligation in the Peace-building Process Chapter 6 The Road to War: War Crimes and the Crime of War in Yugoslavia Chapter 7 The International Response: Self-Interest Wrongly Understood Part 8 Part III: Creating and Employing Justice Based Institutions During the Initial Phases of the Peace-building Process Chapter 9 Establishing the Yugoslav War Crimes Commission and Yugoslav Tribunal: A Judicial Placebo Chapter 10 The Operation of the Yugoslav Tribunal: A Record of Self-Imposed Limits Chapter 11 The International Court of Justice: A Blunt Tool for Peace-building Part 12 Part IV: The Role of Justice in the Negotiation Phase of Peace Building Chapter 13 The Dayton Negotiations: Getting to Yes with War Criminals Chapter 14 Seeking Peace in Kosovo: The Relegation of Justice Chapter 15 The Rambouillet/Paris Negotiations: From Coercive Appeasement to Humanitarian Intervention Part 16 Part V: The Role of Justice in the Implementation Phase of Peace-building Chapter 17 Apprehending War Criminals: Mission Creep or Mission Impossible? Chapter 18 Linking Justice and Economic Inducements: A Road to Peace Chapter 19 The Cohabitation of Justice and Peace: Concluding Observations