Publication | Closed Access
A Multilevel Model of Safety Climate: Cross-Level Relationships Between Organization and Group-Level Climates.
1.3K
Citations
70
References
2005
Year
OrganizationsEngineeringSafety ClimateOrganizational CharacteristicSafety ScienceHuman Resource ManagementOrganizational BehaviorSafety ManagementSafety CultureOrganizational PolicyRisk ManagementManagementGroup-level ClimatesSupervisory DiscretionProcedural FormalizationStrategic ManagementOrganizational SafetyMultilevel ModelOrganizational CommunicationOrganization-environment RelationshipOrganization TheoryBusinessCrisis Management
Organizational climates have been investigated separately at organization and subunit levels. The article tests a multilevel model of safety climate covering both organization and group levels and discusses implications for climate theory. The study employs a multilevel model to assess safety climate at both organization and group levels. Results show organization- and group-level safety climates are globally aligned, with the organization climate’s effect on safety behavior fully mediated by group climate, while supervisory discretion introduces group-level variation and limiting factors reduce variability, though cross-level effects dominate.
Organizational climates have been investigated separately at organization and subunit levels. This article tests a multilevel model of safety climate, covering both levels of analysis. Results indicate that organization-level and group-level climates are globally aligned, and the effect of organization climate on safety behavior is fully mediated by group climate level. However, the data also revealed meaningful group-level variation in a single organization, attributable to supervisory discretion in implementing formal procedures associated with competing demands like safety versus productivity. Variables that limit supervisory discretion (i.e., organization climate strength and procedural formalization) reduce both between-groups climate variation and within-group variability (i.e., increased group climate strength), although effect sizes were smaller than those associated with cross-level climate relationships. Implications for climate theory are discussed.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1