PLoS ONE · 2014 · 38 citations · 25 references
PharmacyChild HealthPediatricsAntimicrobial PharmacotherapyAntimicrobial StewardshipPediatric Infectious DiseasesPediatric Antibiotic TherapyPediatric Antimicrobial TherapyAntibiotic Prescribing In ChildrenAntimicrobial Utilization EvaluationC-reactive Protein TestingControl Group DesignMatched Control GroupPediatric Antibiotic PrescribingProphylactic Antibiotic TherapySerious Bacterial Infection
BACKGROUND: The Lab-score, based on the combined determination of procalcitonin, C-reactive protein and urinary dipstick results, has been shown accurate in detecting serious bacterial infections (SBI) in children with fever without source (FWS) on retrospective cohorts. We aimed to prospectively assess the utility of the Lab-score in safely decreasing antibiotic prescriptions in children with FWS and to determine its diagnostic characteristics compared to common SBI biomarkers. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial in children 7 days to 36 months old with FWS, allocated either to the Lab-score group (Lab-score reported, blinded WBC count) or to the control group (WBC, bands and C-reactive protein determined, blinded procalcitonin and Lab-score), followed up until recovery. Demographic data, antibiotic prescription rate, admission rate and diagnostic properties of the Lab-score were analyzed. RESULTS: 271 children were analyzed. No statistically significant difference concerning antibiotic prescription rate was observed: 41.2% (54 of 131) in the Lab-score group and 42.1% (59 of 140) in the control group (p = 1.000). If recommendations based on the Lab-score had been strictly applied, a hypothetical 30.6% treatment rate would have been encountered, compared to the overall 41.7% observed rate (p = 0.0095). A Lab-score ≥3 showed the following characteristics: sensitivity 85.1% (95% CI: 76.5-93.6%), specificity 87.3% (95% CI: 82.7-91.8%), positive predictive value 68.7% (95% CI: 58.7-78.7%), negative predictive value 94.1% (95% CI: 91.5-97.9%), positive and negative likelihood ratios: 6.68 and 0.17 respectively. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was best for the Lab-score (0.911, 95% CI: 0.871-0.950). DISCUSSION: No difference regarding antibiotic treatment rate was observed when using the Lab-score, due to lack of adherence to the related recommendations. However, if strictly followed, a significant 26.5% reduction of antibiotic prescriptions would have been encountered. Medical education needs to be reinforced in order to observe rather than treat low-risk well-appearing children with FWS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02179398.
25
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Gordon H. Guyatt, Robert Haynes, Roman Z. Jaeschke et al. · JAMA · 2000 · 750 citations
Medicine, Neurology, Psychiatry +14
Observation Scales to Identify Serious Illness in Febrile Children
Paul L. McCarthy, Michael R. Sharpe, Sydney Z. Spiesel et al. · PEDIATRICS · 1982 · 362 citations
Nursing, Child Health, Pediatrics +11
Jonathan C. Craig, Greg Williams, Michael Jones et al. · BMJ · 2010 · 355 citations · Full text