On the performance of quantum cryptographic protocols SARG04 and KMB09

Abstract

Since the first protocol, proposed by Benette and Brassard in 1984 (BB84), the Quantum Cryptographic(QC) protocols has been studied widely in recent years. It is observed that most of the later QC protocols are variants of BB84 with the intention of addressing one or more problems incurred during the practical implementation of BB84 protocol. Amongst many candidates, SARG04 provides robust performance for the weak coherent pulse implementation of QC. Another follower protocol, KMB09 provides improvement in quantum communication distance between Alice and Bob (the classical communicating parties). Both these protocols are chosen to compete, as they found to be a suitable choice for incorporating QC in existing wireless technology. In this paper we present the performance analysis of these two protocols with respect to protocol efficiency, Quantum Bit Error Rate (QBER) and robustness against eavesdropping.