International Journal of Rotating Machinery · 2012 · 56 citations · 10 references
EngineeringFluid MechanicsMechanical EngineeringRotor DynamicMarine EngineeringComputational MechanicsNumerical SimulationPropeller AerodynamicsMarine HydrodynamicsAdvanced Model CalibrationHydrodynamic CavitationComputational Fluid DynamicsPropulsionMultiphase FlowHomogeneous ModelFluid MachineryModel Scale PropellersCavitating FlowAerospace EngineeringAerodynamicsAerospace PropulsionNumerical PredictionsUniform Inflow
The mass transfer models share empirical coefficients that adjust water‑to‑vapour transfer rates, potentially affecting prediction stability and accuracy. Using a commercial CFD solver, the authors performed homogeneous‑model simulations of cavitating flow around two model‑scale propellers, evaluated three mass‑transfer models, and calibrated their empirical coefficients via optimization to ensure a fair comparison. The calibrated models produced similar predictions for the two propellers, but all tended to overestimate cavity extension and consequently mispredict thrust under severe operating conditions.
The numerical predictions of the cavitating flow around two model scale propellers in uniform inflow are presented and discussed. The simulations are carried out using a commercial CFD solver. The homogeneous model is used and the influence of three widespread mass transfer models, on the accuracy of the numerical predictions, is evaluated. The mass transfer models in question share the common feature of employing empirical coefficients to adjust mass transfer rate from water to vapour and back, which can affect the stability and accuracy of the predictions. Thus, for a fair and congruent comparison, the empirical coefficients of the different mass transfer models are first properly calibrated using an optimization strategy. The numerical results obtained, with the three different calibrated mass transfer models, are very similar to each other for two selected model scale propellers. Nevertheless, a tendency to overestimate the cavity extension is observed, and consequently the thrust, in the most severe operational conditions, is not properly predicted.
10
Mathematical Basis and Validation of the Full Cavitation Model
A.K. Singhal, M. M. Athavale, Huiying Li et al. · Journal of Fluids Engineering · 2002 · 1.6K citations