Publication | Closed Access
Team mental models in a team knowledge framework: expanding theory and measurement across disciplinary boundaries
841
Citations
46
References
2001
Year
Project ManagementInformation SharingOrganizational BehaviorPsychologyTeam Mental ModelsCoachingManagementDisciplinary BoundariesVirtual TeamCollective CognitionMental ModelsEmployee LearningStrategic ManagementTeam Knowledge FrameworkPerformance StudiesOrganizational CommunicationKnowledge SharingGroup WorkBusinessKnowledge ManagementWork Group DynamicArtsTeam Training
Research on team mental models remains in its formative stages, and related constructs such as information sharing, transactive memory, group learning, and cognitive consensus exist in parallel across disciplines, warranting integration. This paper aims to enrich the theory of team mental models and broaden empirical research by adopting a cross‑disciplinary focus that incorporates related team knowledge domains. The authors synthesize multiple literatures to construct a framework delineating relationships among team knowledge constructs. The resulting framework elucidates how team mental models interrelate with related constructs such as information sharing, transactive memory, group learning, and cognitive consensus. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Abstract Because research on team mental models is still in its formative stages, there is a need for continued conceptual development of the construct and direct empirical support linking team mental models to team outcomes. Researchers in other fields have developed concepts that are distinct from, but clearly related to team mental models, including information sharing, transactive memory, group learning, and cognitive consensus. Although these research streams currently exist in parallel with little cross‐fertilization, there is much to be gained from integration across disciplinary boundaries. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to enrich the theoretical understanding of team mental models and to broaden the empirical research base by adopting a cross‐disciplinary focus and incorporating related team knowledge domains from other literatures. Based on a synthesis of various literatures, we develop a framework that delineates the relationships among team knowledge constructs. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1