Publication | Closed Access
Remarks on the internal motion in diphenyl ether. Fluorophenyl ethers
33
Citations
0
References
1988
Year
Molecular KineticsC-indo ComputationsEngineeringPhysicsTheoretical Inorganic ChemistryNatural SciencesMagnetic Resonance4-Fluorophenyl Phenyl EtherSpectra-structure CorrelationOrganic ChemistryPhysical ChemistryDiphenyl EtherComputational ChemistryQuantum ChemistryChemistryMolecular ChemistryNuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
The 13 C nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts and the 13 C, 19 F spin–spin coupling constants are reported for 4,4′-difluorophenyl ether and 4-fluorophenyl phenyl ether in CS 2 and in acetone-d 6 solutions. An estimate of 6 J 90 , the extremum in the σ–π coupling constant between the 19 F nucleus on one ring and the ipso 13 C nucleus on the other, is obtained from measurements on 2,6-dibromo-4-fluorophenyl phenyl ether. The ensuing estimates of [Formula: see text], the expectation values of sin 2 θ as obtained from 6 J( 13 C, 19 F), are compared with those obtained from STO-3G MO computations for diphenyl ether and its 4-fluoro derivatives. These computations give conformational energies at 30° intervals of the angles of twist about the two C—O bonds. In rough agreement with C-INDO computations, interconversion of the helical forms is calculated to occur most easily by the so-called one-ring flip mechanism; the barrier to interconversion is less than 1 kJ/mol in the ether and its 4-fluoro derivatives. It appears that the conformational behaviour of these derivatives is unaltered by passage from CS 2 to acetone solutions at 300 K. Furthermore, [Formula: see text] values from 6 J( 13 C, I9 F) in solution are very similar to those obtained from the computations on the free molecules. If this agreement is not accidental, then it may arise from a high degree of flexibility of the molecules in which, by a disrotatory or one-ring flip mechanism requiring a very low energy of activation, one helical or C 2 conformation can be converted to another. The other conformations have considerably higher energies and the solvents do not appear to lower these energies enough to favor their populations significantly at 300 K.