Rapid Prototyping Journal · 2005 · 1.4K citations · 14 references
Natural SciencesMaterials EngineeringMaterials ScienceCeramic MaterialsCeramicsMaterials ChemistryLaser Material ProcessingLaser PhysicsLaser Surface ProcessingPowder ProcessingSinteringSelective Laser MeltingSintering BehaviorSintering KineticsSintering ThermodynamicsThermal Effects In Laser Processing
Binding mechanisms largely determine process speed and part properties in selective laser sintering and melting. This paper surveys binding mechanisms in SLS and SLM to enhance understanding and support the development of new processes. The authors devised a classification of SLS/SLM processes based on binding mechanism, illustrated with a broad set of commercial and experimental examples. Four primary binding categories—solid‑state sintering, chemically induced binding, liquid‑phase sintering (partial melting), and full melting—were identified, with most commercial processes falling into the latter two, which are further subdivided. The classification is not definitive, and some processes may belong to multiple categories depending on interpretation.
Purpose This paper provides an overview of the different binding mechanisms in selective laser sintering (SLS) and selective laser melting (SLM), thus improving the understanding of these processes. Design/methodology/approach A classification of SLS/SLM processes was developed, based on the binding mechanism occurring in the process, in contrast with traditional classifications based on the processed material or the application. A broad range of commercial and experimental SLS/SLM processes – found from recent articles as well as from own experiments – was used to explain the different binding mechanism categories. Findings SLS/SLM processes can be classified into four main binding mechanism categories, namely “solid state sintering”, “chemically induced binding”, “liquid phase sintering – partial melting” and “full melting”. Most commercial processes can be classified into the latter two categories, which are therefore subdivided. The binding mechanism largely influences the process speed and the resulting part properties. Research limitations/implications The classification presented is not claimed to be definitive. Moreover some SLM/SLM processes could be classified into more than one category, based on personal interpretation. Originality/value This paper can be a useful aid in understanding existing SLS/SLM processes. It can also serve as an aid in developing new SLS/SLM processes.
14
Progress in Additive Manufacturing and Rapid Prototyping
J.-P. Kruth, M.C. Leu, Takeo Nakagawa · CIRP Annals · 1998 · 1.3K citations · Full text
Engineering, Manufacturing Engineering, Materials Science +14
Lasers and materials in selective laser sintering
Jean‐Pierre Kruth, X. Wang, Tahar Laoui et al. · Assembly Automation · 2003 · 806 citations