PLoS ONE · 2012 · 264 citations · 25 references
Life SciencesBiochemistryOncologyGastrointestinal OncologyMass Spectrometric AnalysisMetabolomicsCancer MetabolomicsColorectal CancerMass Spectrometry-based MetabolomicsMetabolite IdentificationMetabolite ProfilingMetabolite QuantificationClinical Metabolite ProfilingColorectal Cancer BiomarkersEarly DiagnosisMetabolite-based DiagnosticsMetabolomic Biomarker DiscoveryMetabolomic BiomarkersMetabolomic ScreeningMetabolomic Tumor Markers
BACKGROUND: To improve the quality of life of colorectal cancer patients, it is important to establish new screening methods for early diagnosis of colorectal cancer. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We performed serum metabolome analysis using gas-chromatography/mass-spectrometry (GC/MS). First, the accuracy of our GC/MS-based serum metabolomic analytical method was evaluated by calculating the RSD% values of serum levels of various metabolites. Second, the intra-day (morning, daytime, and night) and inter-day (among 3 days) variances of serum metabolite levels were examined. Then, serum metabolite levels were compared between colorectal cancer patients (N = 60; N = 12 for each stage from 0 to 4) and age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers (N = 60) as a training set. The metabolites whose levels displayed significant changes were subjected to multiple logistic regression analysis using the stepwise variable selection method, and a colorectal cancer prediction model was established. The prediction model was composed of 2-hydroxybutyrate, aspartic acid, kynurenine, and cystamine, and its AUC, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.9097, 85.0%, 85.0%, and 85.0%, respectively, according to the training set data. In contrast, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEA were 35.0%, 96.7%, and 65.8%, respectively, and those of CA19-9 were 16.7%, 100%, and 58.3%, respectively. The validity of the prediction model was confirmed using colorectal cancer patients (N = 59) and healthy volunteers (N = 63) as a validation set. At the validation set, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the prediction model were 83.1%, 81.0%, and 82.0%, respectively, and these values were almost the same as those obtained with the training set. In addition, the model displayed high sensitivity for detecting stage 0-2 colorectal cancer (82.8%). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our prediction model established via GC/MS-based serum metabolomic analysis is valuable for early detection of colorectal cancer and has the potential to become a novel screening test for colorectal cancer.
25
Rebecca L. Siegel, Deepa Naishadham, Ahmedin Jemal · CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · 2012 · 10.7K citations · Full text
Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer
Emanuel F. Petricoin, Ali M. Ardekani, Ben A. Hitt et al. · The Lancet · 2002 · 3.3K citations
Medicine, Gynecology, Oncology +17
Metabolomic profiles delineate potential role for sarcosine in prostate cancer progression
Arun Sreekumar, Laila Poisson, Thekkelnaycke M. Rajendiran et al. · Nature · 2009 · 2.2K citations · Full text
Medicine, Cancer Biology, Oncology +16