Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyDiagnostic MicrobiologyMolecular VirologyVirologyInfectious Disease Molecular TestingViral DiagnosticsViral EpidemiologyViral InfectionsExternal Quality AttributesExternal Quality AuditsExternal Quality InspectionViral Isolation
Reported are the results of a study of an enterovirus proficiency panel for use in isolation and serotyping and/or the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) carried out by 12 laboratories in nine European countries. Eleven laboratories reported results of virus isolation and serotyping. In addition, four laboratories reported results of a PCR for enterovirus detection. Correct virus isolation results were obtained for 105 of 110 samples (95.5%, four false-negatives, one false-positive), and correct PCR results for 39 of 40 (97.5%, one false-negative). The highest isolation rate (87.5%) was observed in primary and tertiary monkey kidney cells; on monkey kidney cell lines, human diploid fibroblasts or human heteroploid cells the isolation rate varied between 64% and 71.4%. Serotyping results were less satisfactory. Only 63 of 106 (59.4%) isolated viruses were typed correctly. Major problems were seen with samples containing mixtures of enteroviruses and with enterovirus 71 or echovirus 4, with 9%, 50%, and 55% correct results, respectively. These results underline the need for improvement of enterovirus typing, especially in view of the poliomyelitis eradication initiative.
21
Reliability of polymerase chain reaction for detection of hepatitis C virus
Hans L. Zaaijer, H.T.M. Cuypers, H. W. Reesink et al. · The Lancet · 1993 · 399 citations
Paralytic poliomyelitis: seasoned strategies, disappearing disease
Harry F. Hull, N. A. Ward, B. Hull et al. · The Lancet · 1994 · 235 citations
Medicine, Infectious Disease Control, Infectious Diseases +10