Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 2010 · 17 citations · 18 references
PharmacyToxicologyAnalytical ChemistryMass Spectrometric AnalysisToxicokineticsBioanalytical Method ValidationInstrumental AnalysisMass SpectrometryMetabolite IdentificationMetabolite QuantificationHigh-resolution Mass AnalysisHigh-resolution SpectrometryLiquid Chromatography-mass SpectrometryLiquid Chromatography-mass Spectrometry AnalysisMass Spectrometric BioanalysisMass Spectrometric DetectionMass Spectrometric QuantificationMultiple Reaction Monitoring
During routine liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometric (LC/MS/MS) bioanalysis of a small molecule analyte in rat serum samples from a toxicokinetic study, an unexpected interfering peak was observed in the extracted ion chromatogram of the internal standard. No interfering peaks were observed in the extracted ion chromatogram of the analyte. The dose-dependent peak area response and peak area response versus time profiles of the interfering peak suggested that it might have been related to a metabolite of the dosed compound. Further investigation using high-resolution mass spectrometry led to unequivocal identification of the interfering peak as an N-desmethyl metabolite of the parent analyte. High-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) was also used to demonstrate that the interfering response of the metabolite in the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) channel of the internal standard was due to an isobaric relationship between the (13)C-isotope of the metabolite and the internal standard (i.e., common precursor ion mass), coupled with a metabolite product ion with identical mass to the product ion used in the MRM transition of the internal standard. These results emphasize (1) the need to carefully evaluate internal standard candidates with regard to potential interferences from metabolites during LC/MS/MS method development, validation and bioanalysis of small molecule analytes in biological matrices; (2) the value of HRMS as a tool to investigate unexpected interferences encountered during LC/MS/MS analysis of small molecules in biological matrices; and (3) the potential for interference regardless of choice of IS and therefore the importance of conducting assay robustness on incurred in vitro or in vivo study samples.
18
Mohammed Jemal, Yuanqing Xia · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 1999 · 127 citations
Naidong Weng, Jean W. Lee, Xiangyu Jiang et al. · Journal of Chromatography B Biomedical Sciences and Applications · 1999 · 104 citations
Masanori KUBO, Yasuo Mizooku, Yukihiro Hirao et al. · Journal of Chromatography B · 2005 · 88 citations
Karina B. Joyce, Anne E. Jones, Rebecca J. Scott et al. · Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry · 1998 · 86 citations