Self-regulatory failure and intimate partner violence perpetration.

Eli J. Finkel, C. Nathan DeWall, Erica B. Slotter, Megan Oaten, Vangie A. Foshee

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2009 · 462 citations · 68 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The studies tested whether self‑regulatory failure predicts intimate partner violence perpetration. The results show that higher self‑control and delayed responses reduce violent impulses, while depletion increases violence and brief training bolsters restraint, highlighting self‑regulation’s importance in predicting IPV.

Abstract

Five studies tested the hypothesis that self-regulatory failure is an important predictor of intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration. Study 1 participants were far more likely to experience a violent impulse during conflictual interaction with their romantic partner than they were to enact a violent behavior, suggesting that self-regulatory processes help individuals refrain from perpetrating IPV when they experience a violent impulse. Study 2 participants high in dispositional self-control were less likely to perpetrate IPV, in both cross-sectional and residualized-lagged analyses, than were participants low in dispositional self-control. Study 3 participants verbalized more IPV-related cognitions if they responded immediately to partner provocations than if they responded after a 10-s delay. Study 4 participants whose self-regulatory resources were experimentally depleted were more violent in response to partner provocation (but not when unprovoked) than were nondepleted participants. Finally, Study 5 participants whose self-regulatory resources were experimentally bolstered via a 2-week training regimen exhibited less violent inclinations than did participants whose self-regulatory resources had not been bolstered. These findings hint at the power of incorporating self-regulation dynamics into predictive models of IPV perpetration.

References

68