Medical Physics · 2008 · 44 citations · 29 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyClinical Radiation OncologyRadiation DosimetryTreatment PlanningPhantom DosimetryRadiation Dose MeasurementRadiation TherapyRadiation Treatment PlanningTreatment Planning Dose CalculationTreatment Planning PhysicsAccuracyAnisotropic Analytical AlgorithmsConvolution-superposition AlgorithmsPencil Beam DosimetryPhantom-based Dose MeasurementRadiation Dose EstimationRadiotherapy Dose PlanningSuperposition Algorithms
The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of five commonly used intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) treatment planning systems (TPSs), 3 using convolution superposition algorithms or the analytical anisotropic algorithm (CSA/AAAs) and 2 using pencil beam algorithms (PBAs), in calculating the absorbed dose within a low-density, heterogeneous region when compared with measurements made in an anthropomorphic thorax phantom. The dose predicted in the target center met the test criteria (5% of the dose normalization point or 3 mm distance to agreement) for all TPSs tested; however, at the tumor-lung interface and at the peripheral lung in the vicinity of the tumor, the CSA/AAAs performed better than the PBAs (85% and 50%, respectively, of pixels meeting the 5%/3-mm test criteria), and thus should be used to determine dose in heterogeneous regions.
29
A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions
Daniel A. Low, William B. Harms, Sasa Mutic et al. · Medical Physics · 1998 · 2.9K citations · Full text
Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method
Daniel A. Low, James F. Dempsey · Medical Physics · 2003 · 752 citations
A convolution method of calculating dose for 15‐MV x rays
T Mackie, John W. Scrimger, Jerry Battista · Medical Physics · 1985 · 521 citations
Dosimetric properties of improved GafChromic films for seven different digitizers
Slobodan Dević, Jan Seuntjens, György Hegyi et al. · Medical Physics · 2004 · 277 citations