Digital Scholarship in the Humanities · 2006 · 88 citations · 15 references
EngineeringWriter IdentificationCommunicationCorpus LinguisticsJournalismText MiningNatural Language ProcessingComputational Social ScienceComputational LinguisticsAuthorship Attribution StudiesCitation AnalysisLanguage StudiesContent AnalysisCurrent StateKnowledge DiscoveryAuthor ProfilingAuthorship AttributionContent Similarity DetectionUnified DevelopmentAttribution TheoryLanguage CorpusLinguistics
Despite a century of research, statistical and computational methods for authorship attribution are neither reliable, well-regarded, widely used, or well-understood. This article presents a survey of the current state of the art as well as a framework for uniform and unified development of a tool to apply the state of the art, despite the wide variety of methods and techniques used. The usefulness of the framework is confirmed by the development of a tool using that framework that can be applied to authorship analysis by researchers without a computing specialization. Using this tool, it may be possible both to expand the pool of available researchers as well as to enhance the quality of the overall solutions [for example, by incorporating improved algorithms as discovered through empirical analysis (Juola, P. (2004a). Ad-hoc Authorship Attribution Competition. In Proceedings 2004 Joint International Conference of the Association for Literary and Linguistic Computing and the Association for Computers and the Humanities (ALLC/ACH 2004), Göteborg, Sweden)].
15
Kenneth C. Hill, Peter Ladefoged · Language · 1977 · 1.8K citations
Phonetic Transcription, Articulation (Literacy Education), Health Sciences +12
1982 · 407 citations
The Characteristic Curves of Composition
T. C. Mendenhall · Science · 1887 · 398 citations
David I. Holmes · Computers and the Humanities · 1994 · 262 citations