Publication | Closed Access
A developmental contextual perspective on identity construction in emerging adulthood: Change dynamics in commitment formation and commitment evaluation.
447
Citations
48
References
2006
Year
Social PsychologyEducationSocial SciencesPsychologyDevelopmental PsychologyTransition To AdulthoodHuman DevelopmentCommitment FormationCore Identity CycleDevelopmental Contextual TestChange DynamicsSocial IdentityIdentity DevelopmentMotivationOrganizational CommitmentCommitment ModelAdult DevelopmentSocial DevelopmentCommitment EvaluationDevelopmental Science
Identity formation involves a commitment‑formation cycle (exploration breadth and commitment making) and a commitment‑evaluation cycle (exploration depth and identification with commitment). The study tests a dual‑cycle model of identity formation in emerging adulthood. The authors used a natural experiment to identify contextual influences on identity development. Latent growth curve analysis of 402 students over two years revealed that commitment‑formation and exploration‑depth rose, identification with commitment fell slightly, and the two identity cycles interwove, with commitment evaluation driving progression to sophomore year and both cycles active for students repeating or changing majors.
A developmental contextual test of a dual-cycle model of identity formation is presented. In addition to a commitment-formation cycle-represented by Marcia's (1966) classical dimensions of exploration in breadth and commitment making--the model comprises a commitment-evaluation cycle--constituted by 2 additional dimensions of exploration in depth and identification with commitment. In a sample of 402 college students assessed 4 times over 2 years, both dimensions of the commitment-formation cycle and exploration in depth increased across time. Identification with commitment showed a slight decrease across time. Latent growth curve (LGC) modeling analyses indicated that the 2 identity cycles are interwoven in a dynamic interplay that defines identity formation. Contextual influences on identity development were identified through a natural experiment. Commitment evaluation constituted the core identity cycle in the normative-progression group (i.e., students who moved on to the sophomore year). Both commitment formation and commitment evaluation were at work in the reorientation group (i.e., students who repeated their freshman year or changed their major). Implications and suggestions for future research are discussed.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1