Publication | Closed Access
X-band rapid-scan EPR of samples with long electron spin relaxation times: a comparison of continuous wave, pulse and rapid-scan EPR
60
Citations
40
References
2013
Year
X-ray SpectroscopyEngineeringMagnetic ResonanceX-ray ImagingElectron SpectroscopyElectron Paramagnetic ResonanceInstrumentationMaterials SciencePhysicsCrystalline DefectsX-band Rapid-scan EprRapid-scan EprRapid-scan SpectraX-ray Free-electron LaserContinuous WaveSpintronicsNatural SciencesSpectroscopyApplied PhysicsCondensed Matter PhysicsElectron Spin Resonance Dating
X-band room temperature spectra obtained by rapid-scan, continuous wave, field-swept echo-detected and Fourier transform electron paramagnetic resonance (FTEPR) were compared for three samples with long electron spin relaxation times: amorphous hydrogenated silicon (T1 = 11 μs, T2 = 3.3 μs), 0.2% N@C60 solid (T1 = 120–160 μs, T2 = 2.8 μs) and neutral single substitutional nitrogen centres (NS0) in diamonds (T1 = 2300 μs, T2 = 230 μs). For each technique, experimental parameters were selected to give less than 2% broadening of the lineshape. For the same data acquisition times, the signal-to-noise for the rapid-scan spectra was one-to-two orders of magnitude better than for continuous wave or field-swept echo-detected spectra. For amorphous hydrogenated silicon, T2* (∼ 10 ns) is too short to perform FTEPR. For 0.2% N@C60, the signal-to-noise ratio for rapid scan is about five times better than for FTEPR. For NS0 the signal-to-noise ratio is similar for rapid scan and FTEPR.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1