Publication | Closed Access
Product-Process Development Integration in Manufacturing
189
Citations
28
References
1995
Year
New DesignEngineeringIndustrial EngineeringProcess DevelopmentProduct ManagementProduct DevelopmentManagementEngineering Job RotationNew Product DevelopmentTechnology TransferNew Program LaunchesDesignManufacturing InnovationProduct-process Development IntegrationConsumer-driven Product DevelopmentIndustrial DesignDesign InnovationProcess InnovationBusinessDesign ThinkingProduct ModelingProcess Technology
Organizations differ widely in how they introduce new products and services. This study proposes that such variance can be explained by the degree of integration between product design and process design during new program launches. A mailed survey of 43 domestic firms tested four propositions about product‑process development practices. Firms employing rare design‑manufacturing integration mechanisms such as engineering job rotation and mobility achieved higher sales per employee, and discriminant analysis showed that firms benchmarking on product development practices were more likely to use both rare and common integration forms—training personnel, manufacturing sign‑off, and team restructuring—and had more degreed manufacturing engineers, while larger firms and business units took longer to develop new products.
Organizations vary greatly in their approaches and success in the introduction of new products and services. In this study, it was proposed that much of this variance can be captured by understanding the extend to which product design and process design are integrated in new program launches. A mailed survey of 43 domestic firms was used to test four propositions concerning product-process development practices. Significantly, it was found that firms using the more rare design-manufacturing personnel integrating mechanisms (engineering job rotation and mobility) have higher sales per employee. Results of a discriminant analysis show that firms benchmarking on product development practices, as contrasted with performance benchmarks, were significantly more likely to use both the rare and the more common forms of design-manufacturing integration (i.e., train personnel in new design, methods, have manufacturing sign-off on design reviews, and restructure, e.g., use teams). Significantly, these firms also report a greater proportion of degreed manufacturing engineers. Not surprisingly, larger firms and business units were found to take longer to develop new products.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1