Publication | Open Access
A Psychometric Evaluation of 4-Point and 6-Point Likert-Type Scales in Relation to Reliability and Validity
481
Citations
49
References
1994
Year
Quality Of LifeReli AbilityTrait VarianceItem Response TheoryEducationPsychometricsPsychologySelf-efficacy TheoryFactor AnalysisSelf-report StudyPsychometric EvaluationPsychological EvaluationReliability AnalysisReliabilityPsychiatryQuantitative Attitudes6-Point Likert-type ScalesConfirmatory ResearchSelf-assessment
Reliability and validity of 4-point and 6-point scales were assessed using a new model-based ap proach to fit empirical data. Different measurement models were fit by confirmatory factor analyses of a multitrait-multimethod covariance matrix. 165 gradu ate students responded to nine items measuring three quantitative attitudes. Separation of method from trait variance led to greater reduction of reliability and heterotrait-monomethod coefficients for the 6-point scale than for the 4-point scale. Criterion-related valid ity was not affected by the number of scale points. The issue of selecting 4- versus 6-point scales may not be generally resolvable, but may rather depend on the empirical setting. Response conditions theorized to in fluence the use of scale options are discussed to pro vide directions for further research. Index terms: Likert-type scales, multitrait-multimethod matrix, reli ability, scale options, validity.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1