Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · 2008 · 163 citations · 17 references
MedicineCardiologySurgeryCardiothoracic SurgeryInterventional CardiologyMedical RoboticsCatheter AblationMinimally Invasive Cardiothoracic SurgeryMinimally Invasive SurgeryRobot-assisted SurgeryRobotic Catheter NavigationSurgical RoboticsAblation Lesion FormationCrater FormationCrater Formation MechanicsForce Sensing In Catheter NavigationLesion Location IndicationsRobotic Catheters
INTRODUCTION: Popping, char and perforation are complications that can occur following catheter ablation. We measured the amount of grams (g) applied to the endocardium during ablation using a sensor incorporated in the long sheath of a robotic system. We evaluated the relationship between lesion formation, pressure, and the development of complications. METHODS: Using a robotic navigation system, lesions were placed in the left atrium (LA) at six settings, using a constant duration (40 seconds) and flow rate of either 17 cc/min or 30 cc/min with an open irrigated catheter (OIC). Evidence of complications was noted and lesion location recorded for later analysis at necropsy. RESULTS: Lesions using 30 Watts (W) were more likely to be transmural at higher (>40 g) than lower (<30 g) pressures (75% vs 25%, P < 0.001). Significantly higher number of lesions using >40 g of pressure demonstrated "popping" and crater formation as compared with lesions with 20-30 g of pressure (41% vs 15%, P = 0.008). A majority of lesions placed using higher power (45 W) with higher pressures (>40 g) were associated with char and crater formation (66.7%). No lesions using 10 g of pressure were transmural, regardless of the power. Lesions placed with a power setting less than 35 W were more likely to result in "relative" sparing of the endocardial surface than lesions at a power setting higher than 35 W (62% vs 33.3%, P = 0.02) regardless of the pressure. CONCLUSIONS: When using an OIC, lower power settings (<or=35 W) and lower/medium contact pressure were more likely to show a "relative" spared endocardial surface. Overall, contact pressure between 20 g and 30 g and a power setting of 40 W appeared to achieve transmurality by preserving safety.
17
Atrial Electroanatomic Remodeling After Circumferential Radiofrequency Pulmonary Vein Ablation
Carlo Pappone, Giuseppe Oreto, Salvatore Rosanio et al. · Circulation · 2001 · 866 citations · Full text
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +10
Initial Experience With Remote Catheter Ablation Using a Novel Magnetic Navigation System
Sabine Ernst, Feifan Ouyang, Christian Linder et al. · Circulation · 2004 · 350 citations · Full text
Peter M. Kistler, Siew Yen Ho, Kim Rajappan et al. · Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology · 2007 · 290 citations
Medicine, Cardiology, Surgery +17