Chaos An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science · 2012 · 256 citations · 23 references
PlanningSystems EngineeringCritical Infrastructure ProtectionHazard Mitigation PlanningInfrastructure Systems AnalysisInfrastructure ResiliencePower Grid AnalysisResilience AssessmentResilience EngineeringResilient System DesignUrban ResilienceGeneratorsGrid ResiliencePower Grid ResiliencePower System ResilienceResilienceResilience SimulationSystem ResilienceUrban Infrastructure Resilience
Urban infrastructure resilience is defined as the ability to resist hazards, absorb initial damage, and recover multiple times over a period T, with three forms—previous, current potential, and future potential—depending on T’s timing. The study proposes and evaluates an approach to assess and improve time‑dependent resilience, focusing on future potential resilience that accounts for future system evolution. The authors simulate a Harris County power grid, evaluating time‑dependent resilience and strategies such as situational awareness, demand management, and distributed generator integration. Simulations reveal that resilience behaves nonlinearly with time, exhibiting threshold‑driven transitions, and that strategies can boost short‑term resilience yet potentially degrade long‑term utility performance.
This paper introduces an approach to assess and improve the time-dependent resilience of urban infrastructure systems, where resilience is defined as the systems’ ability to resist various possible hazards, absorb the initial damage from hazards, and recover to normal operation one or multiple times during a time period T. For different values of T and its position relative to current time, there are three forms of resilience: previous resilience, current potential resilience, and future potential resilience. This paper mainly discusses the third form that takes into account the systems’ future evolving processes. Taking the power transmission grid in Harris County, Texas, USA as an example, the time-dependent features of resilience and the effectiveness of some resilience-inspired strategies, including enhancement of situational awareness, management of consumer demand, and integration of distributed generators, are all simulated and discussed. Results show a nonlinear nature of resilience as a function of T, which may exhibit a transition from an increasing function to a decreasing function at either a threshold of post-blackout improvement rate, a threshold of load profile with consumer demand management, or a threshold number of integrated distributed generators. These results are further confirmed by studying a typical benchmark system such as the IEEE RTS-96. Such common trends indicate that some resilience strategies may enhance infrastructure system resilience in the short term, but if not managed well, they may compromise practical utility system resilience in the long run.
23
Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems
C. S. Holling · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · 1973 · 17.8K citations · Full text
Life Sciences, Biology, Ecology +8
C. Grigg, P. Wong, P. F. Albrecht et al. · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 1999 · 3.1K citations
Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Systems Engineering +15
Göran Andersson, P. Donalek, Richard G. Farmer et al. · IEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2005 · 1.3K citations
Planning, Electrical Engineering, Critical Infrastructure Protection +15