RESPONSIBILITY AND GLOBAL JUSTICE: A SOCIAL CONNECTION MODEL

Iris Marion Young

Social Philosophy and Policy · 2006 · 1.1K citations · 3 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The essay theorizes moral agents’ responsibilities toward global structural social processes that produce unjust outcomes. The study asks how moral agents should conceptualize their responsibilities toward global injustice and proposes a social‑connection model of responsibility. The authors develop a social‑connection model of responsibility, illustrated through transnational clothing production, contrasting it with a liability model and outlining five distinguishing features—non‑isolation of perpetrators, judgment of background conditions, forward‑looking orientation, shared responsibility, and requirement of collective action—while proposing reasoning parameters for agents. The model concludes that every agent contributing to structural injustice bears responsibility to remedy it.

Abstract

The essay theorizes the responsibilities moral agents may be said to have in relation to global structural social processes that have unjust consequences. How ought moral agents, whether individual or institutional, conceptualize their responsibilities in relation to global injustice? I propose a model of responsibility from social connection as an interpretation of obligations of justice arising from structural social processes. I use the example of justice in transnational processes of production, distribution and marketing of clothing to illustrate operations of structural social processes that extend widely across regions of the world. The social connection model of responsibility says that all agents who contribute by their actions to the structural processes that produce injustice have responsibilities to work to remedy these injustices. I distinguish this model from a more standard model of responsibility, which I call a liability model. I specify five features of the social connection model of responsibility that distinguish it from the liability model: it does not isolate perpetrators; it judges background conditions of action; it is more forward looking than backward looking; its responsibility is essentially shared; and it can be discharged only through collective action. The final section of the essay begins to articulate parameters of reasoning that agents can use for thinking about their own action in relation to structural injustice.

References

3