Publication | Closed Access
Simultaneous Communication in the Classroom: How Well is English Grammar Represented?
147
Citations
17
References
1979
Year
American Deaf CultureSpeech SciencesLanguage DevelopmentLanguage EducationEnglish Language LearningEducational CommunicationCommunicationClassroom DiscourseLanguage LearningLanguage ProficiencyLanguage TeachingChild LanguageLanguage AcquisitionGrammarLanguage StudiesInteractional LinguisticsAmerican Sign LanguageHealth SciencesSimultaneous CommunicationSpeech ProductionFacial ExpressionHow WellSpeech CommunicationHearing SciencesSpeechlanguage PathologySign LanguageClassroom LanguageEnglish Grammar RepresentedAmerican Sign Language LinguisticsSpeech PerceptionLinguisticsDeaf Studies
The study analyzes classroom simultaneous communication to assess its representation of English grammar. The authors recorded two hearing teachers in a residential school for deaf children and compared their spoken and signed utterances on English grammatical structures and ASL non‑manual cues. Signed utterances were largely ungrammatical in both English and ASL, underscoring the need for stricter teacher training in simultaneous communication. The study identifies additional research questions for future investigation.
Simultaneous communication as used in classrooms is here analyzed to determine how well it represents English grammar. Samples of the communication used in teaching were collected from two hearing teachers as they conducted regular classes at a large residential school for deaf children. Comparisons were made between teachers’ spoken and signed utterance with respect to grammatical construction, including declarative sentences, questions, relative clauses, pronoun use, and verb tense in English, and to such specifics as facial expression, head and body tilt, eye gaze, and use of space in American Sign Language (ASL). Results showed that signed utterances were predominantly ungrammatical with respect both to rules of English and to rules of ASL. The need to institute stricter requirements so that teachers of the deaf become better equipped to use simultaneous communication as well as other forms of communication is made salient by this study. Related issues requiring further research are also considered.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1