Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective.

Elena Stephan, Nira Liberman, Yaacov Trope

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · 2010 · 372 citations · 37 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Politeness theory posits that politeness both reflects and regulates social distance. The study predicted that politeness would be associated with abstract construal, temporal distance, and spatial distance. Across eight studies, politeness increased with abstract, temporal, and spatial distance, and conversely, higher politeness produced greater abstract, temporal, and spatial distance, illustrating the interrelation of psychological distance dimensions across cultures and languages.

Abstract

According to politeness theory (P. Brown & S. Levinson, 1987), politeness serves to both reflect and regulate social distance. On the basis of this notion and on construal level theory (N. Liberman & Y. Trope, 2008; N. Liberman, Y. Trope, & E. Stephan, 2007), it was predicted that politeness would be related to abstract construal, temporal distance, and spatial distance. Eight studies supported this prediction. Politeness increased when the addressees were construed abstractly (Study 1), were temporally distant (Studies 2, 3), and were spatially distant (Study 4). It was also found that increasing politeness produced abstract construals (Study 5), greater temporal distance (Study 6), and greater spatial distance (Study 7, 8). These findings shed light on the way politeness operates in different cultures and is conveyed in different languages, and they support the idea that dimensions of psychological distance are interrelated.

References

37