The Journal of Infection in Developing Countries · 2008 · 32 citations · 15 references
Life SciencesInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyAntimicrobial ResistanceDiagnostic MicrobiologyMedical MicrobiologyAntibiotic ResistanceAntimicrobial Susceptibility TestingBacterial EpidemiologyBacterial InfectionsPathogen DetectionBacterial Resistance DetectionConventional Polymerase Chain ReactionDisk Diffusion TestingMethicillin ResistancePolymerase Chain Reaction DetectionRapid Antimicrobial Resistance DetectionRapid Detection AssaysStaphylococcus Aureus Detection
BACKGROUND: Accurate and rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is very important in a clinical laboratory setting to avoid treatment failure. Conventional methods were compared against the gold standard polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique to determine the best combination of the routine procedures. METHODOLOGY: Methicillin resistance was investigated in 416 clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates by PCR, oxacillin agar screening (OAS), oxacillin disk diffusion (ODD) and cefoxitin disk diffusion (CDD) methods. RESULTS: Two hundred and ten (51%) out of 416 S. aureus strains were found to be mecA-positive by PCR. Sensitivity and specificity of the ODD, CDD and OAS methods were detected as follows: 100% and 89%, 99.50% and 100%, and 99.50% and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combining the ODD and CDD methods could be a good choice for detecting methicillin resistance in S. aureus strains where mecA PCR cannot be performed.
15
THE JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY
The Medical Journal of Australia · 1975 · 1.9K citations
A Felten, Bernadette Grandry, Philippe Lagrange et al. · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2002 · 273 citations · Full text
H. Van Landuyt, Barbara Cauwelier, B. Gordts et al. · European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases · 2004 · 136 citations
Yutaka Tokue, Satoru Shoji, Ken Satoh et al. · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · 1992 · 135 citations