American Journal of International Law · 2000 · 196 citations · 0 references
LawInternational LawInternational Dispute SettlementInternational Trade LawPublic International LawCountervailing MeasuresDispute ResolutionDispute SettlementSettlement ProceduresTrade ComplianceTrade RegulationCompliance In Trade AgreementsCompliance ProceedingsCompliance With AgreementsCountermeasures By International OrganizationsEnforcementExpedited ProcedureRule Enforcement MechanismsWorld Trade Organization Dispute Settlement
In the thirty cases that have led to the adoption of dispute settlement reports in the World Trade Organization (WTO), the enforcement tool of last resort—countermeasures—has been invoked five times. This number is more—in five years—than in the forty-seven-year history of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), the WTO’s predecessor. In addition, on six occasions WTO members have invoked the expedited procedure to solve disagreements concerning compliance with dispute setdement reports, a procedure newly introduced with the establishment of the WTO. In another case, compliance procedures are looming.