Defence and Peace Economics · 1996 · 86 citations · 30 references
Social SciencesEconomicsPolitical ScienceArmed ConflictBenefit-cost AnalysisForeign Policy AnalysisCold WarDefense ExpenditureDefense PolicyBurdenBurden Sharing AnalysisCold War PoliticsDefense Burden SharingDefense Cost AnalysisDefense Expenditure AnalysisDefense Resource AllocationDefense Spending Determinants
This paper presents an up‐to‐date study of defense burden sharing in NATO for 1960–1992, using a variety of burden‐sharing measures. By analyzing the relationship between GDP and the proportion of GDP allocated to defense, we demonstrate that the exploitation of the large allies by the small ended around 1967 and never returned. A comparison of defense burdens and defense benefits received is supportive of the joint product model as explaining NATO burden‐sharing behavior during the last 25 years. Despite recent profound changes, including the end to the Cold War, the Reagan build‐up of forces, and the modernization of strategic forces, the joint product model remains applicable. Policy conclusions are drawn.
30
The Logic of Collective Action.
Robert T. Golembiewski, Mancur Olson · American Sociological Review · 1966 · 11.6K citations
Practical Nonparametric Statistics
David J. Groggel, W. J. Conover · Technometrics · 2000 · 11.1K citations
An Economic Theory of Alliances
Mancur Olson, Richard Zeckhauser · The Review of Economics and Statistics · 1966 · 1.5K citations
Practical Nonparametric Statistics.
P. K. Sen, W. J. Conover · Journal of the American Statistical Association · 1972 · 1K citations
IMPURITY OF DEFENSE: AN APPLICATION TO THE ECONOMICS OF ALLIANCES
Todd Sandler · Kyklos · 1977 · 263 citations