Can an appropriateness evaluation tool be used to prioritize patients on a waiting list for cataract extraction?

References

Page 1

	Year	Citations
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT J Martin Bland, DouglasG. Altman The Lancet ReliabilityEngineeringPatient SafetyDiagnosisEducation	1986	47K
The VF-14 Earl P. Steinberg Archives of Ophthalmology	1994	952
A Method for the Detailed Assessment of the Appropriateness of Medical Technologies Robert H. Brook, Mark R. Chassin, Arlène Fink, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care Randomized Clinical TrialHeart FailureMedical TechnologyQuality EvaluationMedical Treatment	1986	753
The New Zealand priority criteria project. Part 1: Overview David C. Hadorn, A. C Holmes BMJ	1997	331
International Applicability of the VF-14 Jordi Alonso, Mireia Espallargues, Tavs Folmer Andersen, Ophthalmology International ResearchTechnologyTechnology Readiness LevelInternational RelationsGlobal Comparison	1997	175
Impact of visual impairment on use of community support services by elderly persons: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Jie Jin Wang, Paul Mitchell, Wayne Smith, PubMed	1999	152
Setting priorities for waiting lists: defining our terms. Steering Committee of the Western Canada Waiting List Project. D C Hadorn PubMed Policy AnalysisEmergency CareKey TermsPrimary CareManagement	2000	83
Determinants of patient satisfaction with cataract surgery and length of time on the waiting list Barbara Conner‐Spady British Journal of Ophthalmology	2004	68
Responsiveness and Clinically Important Differences for the VF-14 Index, SF-36, and Visual Acuity in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery Amaia Bilbao, José M. Quintana, Antonio Escobar, Ophthalmology Ophthalmic SurgeryOcular DiseaseOphthalmologyClinically Important DifferencesEye Tracking	2009	68
Waiting Times for Surgical Procedures Carolyn DeCoster, Keumhee C. Carrière, Sandra Peterson, Medical Care	1999	67

Page 1