Predictors for Identification of Stigmata of Recent Hemorrhage on Colonic Diverticula in Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding

Ryota Niikura, Naoyoshi Nagata, Tomonori Aoki, Takuro Shimbo, Shohei Tanaka, Katsunori Sekine, Yoshihiro Kishida, Kazuhiro Watanabe, Toshiyuki Sakurai, Chizu Yokoi,

Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · 2014 · 74 citations · 21 references

Concepts

Abstract

GOALS: The aim of this study was to identify predictors for the identification of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (SRH) on colonic diverticula. BACKGROUND: Several factors influence the identification of SRH in the diagnosis of colonic diverticular bleeding. STUDY: A total of 396 patients hospitalized for lower gastrointestinal bleeding were analyzed. Comorbidities, medications, timing of colonoscopy [<24 h (h); urgent, 24 to 48 h, >48 h], preparation, expert colonoscopist, use of a cap, use of a water-jet scope, total colonoscopy, and procedure time (over 60 min) were assessed. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to estimate odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Two hundred fifteen patients were diagnosed with colonic diverticular bleeding and 37 (17%) were identified with SRH. Urgent colonoscopy (OR, 8.4; 95% CI, 2.3-30; P<0.01), expert colonoscopist (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.2-7.3; P=0.02), use of a cap (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.4-8.0; P=0.01), and use of water-jet scope (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 2.3-15; P<0.01) were found to be independent predictive factors for SRH. The accuracy of these factors in combination was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96) as measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC). SRH identification rate was higher in the urgent (22%) than in the 24 to 48 hours (2.9%, P<0.01) and >48 hours groups (1.0%, P<0.01), showing a tendency to decrease with time (P<0.01 for trend). CONCLUSIONS: Factors of urgent colonoscopy, expert colonoscopist, use of a cap, and use of water-jet scope are useful for identifying SRH diverticula.

References

21