Organizational Research Methods · 2006 · 188 citations · 41 references
EducationEducational MeasurementMeasurement InvariancePsychometricsTest ConstructionConfigural InvarianceFactor AnalysisFactor Loading InvarianceModel Fit AssessmentStructural Equation ModelingStructural InvarianceConfirmatory Factor Analysis InvarianceInvariant Factor StructureItem ParcelingItem-level Invariance AssessmentMeasurement Model InvarianceModel Fit ComparisonTesting Measurement InvarianceWeak Invariance
Parcelling items in CFA can improve estimation and fit, yet it can distort measurement invariance testing. Simulations show parcel-based CFA models overstate measurement invariance, whereas item‑level tests provide more accurate detection.
Combining items into parcels in confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) can improve model estimation and fit. Because adequate model fit is imperative for CFA tests of measurement invariance, parcels have frequently been used. However, the use of parcels as indicators in a CFA model can have serious detrimental effects on tests of measurement invariance. Using simulated data with a known lack of invariance, the authors illustrate how models using parcels as indicator variables erroneously indicate that measurement invariance exists much more often than do models using items as indicators. Moreover, item-by-item tests of measurement invariance were often more informative than were tests of the entire parameter matrices.
41
Sample size in factor analysis.
Robert C. MacCallum, Keith F. Widaman, Shaobo Zhang et al. · Psychological Methods · 1999 · 4.8K citations
Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance
William Meredith · Psychometrika · 1993 · 4.5K citations