Feasibility and Acceptability of Clinic-Based Telepsychiatry for Low-Income Hispanic Primary Care Patients

Jenny Chong, Francisco Moreno

Telemedicine Journal and e-Health · 2012 · 111 citations · 26 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Telemedicine is posited to improve patient care beyond direct service delivery. In a randomized trial of 167 low‑income Hispanic adults with major depression, participants received either monthly video telepsychiatry sessions at a community health center or usual care, with outcomes measured via appointment adherence, therapeutic alliance, satisfaction, antidepressant use, depression severity, and functional days. Telepsychiatry was found to be acceptable—patients reported higher alliance and satisfaction and greater antidepressant use—but its feasibility was limited, as there were no differences in appointment adherence, overall depression scores, or functional days, and willingness to pay was higher for telepsychiatry.

Abstract

The feasibility and acceptability of telepsychiatry for low-income Hispanic patients with major depression were assessed.In total, 167 adult Hispanic patients with major depression recruited from a community health center (CHC) were randomly assigned to receive psychiatry services through a video Webcam (WEB) (n=80) or to treatment as usual (TAU) (n=87). The WEB condition consisted of monthly telepsychiatry sessions at the CHC for 6 months provided by one of two Hispanic psychiatrists using an online virtual meeting program. TAU patients received their care from their providers. Acceptability was assessed by comparing appointment keeping for primary care versus telepsychiatry, patients' perceived working alliance with their provider, visit satisfaction, and antidepressant use. Feasibility was assessed using depression outcomes, functional days (unproductive or days lost), and whether WEB and TAU patients differed in their appointment keeping.WEB patients did not differ in the proportion of completed primary care versus telepsychiatry appointments and rated their working alliance with the psychiatrist and their visit satisfaction significantly higher than the TAU patients with their provider. Significantly more WEB than TAU patients used antidepressants. Although depression severity decreased faster among WEB than TAU patients, no differences were found in the overall depression score. WEB and TAU patients did not differ in the number of days that were lost or unproductive due to depression. Although WEB and TAU patients reported being willing to pay for mental health services provided by the CHC, almost proportionately twice as many WEB patients were willing to pay for telepsychiatry.Results show that for low-income depressed Hispanic patients, telepsychiatry service for depression is acceptable, although its feasibility is questionable. The benefits of telemedicine were discussed in terms of improving patient care in ways other than directly providing services to the patients.

References

26