Journal of Flood Risk Management · 2009 · 23 citations · 9 references
Natural ResourcesEnvironmental PolicyFlood Risk ManagementFloodplain ManagementProtected Area PolicyFlood Damage ReductionFlood GovernanceFlood MitigationFlood Risk AssessmentFlood Risk PolicyFlood Risk ReductionBenefit-cost BalanceBenefit-risk RatioEconomic Damage AssessmentFlood Consequence AnalysisFlood Mitigation Cost-benefit AnalysisFlood Mitigation PolicyFlood Risk Reduction PoliciesProtection
Abstract River and coastal floodplains are often protected by vast systems of connected embankments. In the Netherlands, about 55% of the country is protected in this way, by some 3600 km of primary defences. The protection level is probably the highest in the world, and annual mean flood risks are low. Nevertheless, the consequences of a major flood event might be unacceptable. This is a reason to consider whether and how the consequences of floods could be reduced in a cost‐effective manner. Splitting up large polder areas into smaller portions, the so‐called compartmentalisation, would reduce the area subject to flooding, and thus the economic damage, the number of people exposed and the fatality risk. We carried out a policy analysis for the national authorities in order to establish whether, where and under which conditions a further compartmentalisation of the country would be desirable. This paper gives some results, discusses our experiences in four case studies and finally focuses on the fundamental questions of assessment and the trade‐off between better flood protection and the benefit/cost ratio of reducing consequences.
9