Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy · 2012 · 30 citations · 43 references
MedicineOrthopaedic SurgeryOrthopedic SurgeryJoint Replacement SurgeryOrthopedicsArthroplasty BiomechanicsJoint PreservationKnee ArthroplastyKnee BiomechanicsLigament FunctionLigament ReconstructionCruciate Ligament SurgeryKnee Joint StabilityKnee StabilityPosterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionTotal Knee Arthroplasty Biomechanics
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate whether the preservation of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) can be helpful for improving kinematics and clinical outcome in highly conforming mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Ninety osteoarthritic knees were randomly allocated to either the PCL-preserving group or the PCL-sacrificing group. Passive kinematics was recorded with a navigation system immediately after implantation. Three parameters (anterior/posterior translation, varus/valgus rotation, and internal/external rotation) were analysed from 0° to 120° flexion. RESULTS: The PCL-preserving group (42 knees) had more varus rotation over 90° flexion (p < 0.05) and more anterior translation of the femur in all ranges of flexion (p < 0.05) than those in the PCL-sacrificing group (44 knees). There was no difference in the internal/external rotation (p > 0.05). The range of motion, functional scores, and radiographic results did not significantly differ between the two groups at the final follow-up. Three knees in the PCL-preserving group were revised: two presented with instability caused by traumatic attenuation of the PCL and one with subluxation of the insert due to a tight PCL. CONCLUSION: The preservation of the PCL was not helpful for improving kinematics and clinical outcome in highly conforming mobile-bearing TKA.
43
Nicholas Bellamy, W. Watson Buchanan, Charles H. Goldsmith et al. · PubMed · 1988 · 7.8K citations
Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.