Publication | Closed Access
Mechanics and energetics of medusan jet propulsion
139
Citations
17
References
1983
Year
EngineeringFitnessTheoretical ModelMotor ControlLocomotor PerformanceKinesiologyBiomechanicsBio-inspired RoboticsManeuveringHealth SciencesMarine HydrodynamicsMedusan Jet PropulsionRocket EngineJet PropulsionPropulsionLocomotion (Animal Biomechanics)Bipedal LocomotionAerospace EngineeringPhysiologyAerodynamicsAcceleration ReactionSelf-propulsionHuman MovementAerospace Propulsion
The study develops a theoretical model to describe the mechanics and energetics of medusae that swim by jet propulsion. The authors construct a model that analyzes the fluid forces and energetic costs associated with medusan jet propulsion. The model predicts that acceleration reaction dominates over drag, identifies behavioral parameters that maximize velocity, efficiency, and escape performance, shows many medusae operate near these optima, and that the efficiency‑to‑cost ratio links swimming behavior to size, with a unique optimal size for each shape‑behavior pair.
A theoretical model is developed to describe the mechanics and energetics of medusae which swim by jet propulsion. The model leads to four generalizations: (i) The acceleration reaction, not drag, is the dominant fluid force experienced by swimming medusae. (ii) There exist behaviors such as contraction time and relative duration of the relaxation of contraction phases which maximize the velocity and efficiency and minimize the cost of locomotion during normal swimming. Also, escape performance is maximized with certain behaviors. Existing data for medusae show that many operate near these optima. (iii) The ratio of efficiency to cost of locomotion is a reasonable measure of swimming behavior and provides a means to study the relationships between swimming behavior and size, (iv) For medusae of a particular shape exhibiting a particular swimming behavior there exists a unique size which maximizes the ratio of efficiency to cost of locomotion.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
1964 | 2.1K | |
1965 | 1.3K | |
1971 | 282 | |
1975 | 262 | |
1978 | 243 | |
1979 | 160 | |
1958 | 127 | |
1950 | 122 | |
1972 | 107 | |
1969 | 90 |
Page 1
Page 1