Molecular & Cellular Proteomics · 2014 · 38 citations · 43 references
MedicineOncologyPathologyMolecular OncologyNeoplasiaProteomicsCancer BiomarkersHepatic PathologyHepatobiliary PathologyImmunohistochemistryLiver CancerTumor MarkersBiomarker DetectionDiagnostic ImmunohistochemistryImmunohistochemical BiomarkersImmunohistochemical DetectionImmunohistochemical MarkersImmunohistochemical StainingLabel-free ProteomicsMass Spectrometry Proteomics
The aim of this study was the identification of novel biomarker candidates for the diagnosis of cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) and its immunohistochemical differentiation from benign liver and bile duct cells. CCC is a primary cancer that arises from the epithelial cells of bile ducts and is characterized by high mortality rates due to its late clinical presentation and limited treatment options. Tumorous tissue and adjacent non-tumorous liver tissue from eight CCC patients were analyzed by means of two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis and mass-spectrometry-based label-free proteomics. After data analysis and statistical evaluation of the proteins found to be differentially regulated between the two experimental groups (fold change ≥ 1.5; p value ≤ 0.05), 14 candidate proteins were chosen for determination of the cell-type-specific expression profile via immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 14 patients. This confirmed the significant up-regulation of serpin H1, 14-3-3 protein sigma, and stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 in tumorous cholangiocytes relative to normal hepatocytes and non-tumorous cholangiocytes, whereas some proteins were detectable specifically in hepatocytes. Because stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 exhibited both sensitivity and specificity of 100%, an immunohistochemical verification examining tissue sections of 60 CCC patients was performed. This resulted in a specificity of 98% and a sensitivity of 64%. We therefore conclude that this protein should be considered as a potential diagnostic biomarker for CCC in an immunohistochemical application, possibly in combination with other candidates from this study in the form of a biomarker panel. This could improve the differential diagnosis of CCC and benign bile duct diseases, as well as metastatic malignancies in the liver. The aim of this study was the identification of novel biomarker candidates for the diagnosis of cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) and its immunohistochemical differentiation from benign liver and bile duct cells. CCC is a primary cancer that arises from the epithelial cells of bile ducts and is characterized by high mortality rates due to its late clinical presentation and limited treatment options. Tumorous tissue and adjacent non-tumorous liver tissue from eight CCC patients were analyzed by means of two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis and mass-spectrometry-based label-free proteomics. After data analysis and statistical evaluation of the proteins found to be differentially regulated between the two experimental groups (fold change ≥ 1.5; p value ≤ 0.05), 14 candidate proteins were chosen for determination of the cell-type-specific expression profile via immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 14 patients. This confirmed the significant up-regulation of serpin H1, 14-3-3 protein sigma, and stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 in tumorous cholangiocytes relative to normal hepatocytes and non-tumorous cholangiocytes, whereas some proteins were detectable specifically in hepatocytes. Because stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 exhibited both sensitivity and specificity of 100%, an immunohistochemical verification examining tissue sections of 60 CCC patients was performed. This resulted in a specificity of 98% and a sensitivity of 64%. We therefore conclude that this protein should be considered as a potential diagnostic biomarker for CCC in an immunohistochemical application, possibly in combination with other candidates from this study in the form of a biomarker panel. This could improve the differential diagnosis of CCC and benign bile duct diseases, as well as metastatic malignancies in the liver. Cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC) 1The abbreviations used are:CCCcholangiocellular carcinoma2D-DIGEtwo-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresisAUCarea under the curveABAT4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase, mitochondrialAPOA4apolipoprotein A-IVBHMTbetaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase 1CIconfidence intervalFABP1fatty acid–binding protein 1SFN14-3-3 protein σSTIP1stress-induced phosphoprotein 1. 1The abbreviations used are:CCCcholangiocellular carcinoma2D-DIGEtwo-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresisAUCarea under the curveABAT4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase, mitochondrialAPOA4apolipoprotein A-IVBHMTbetaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase 1CIconfidence intervalFABP1fatty acid–binding protein 1SFN14-3-3 protein σSTIP1stress-induced phosphoprotein 1. is a malignant neoplasm that arises from the cholangiocytes, the epithelial cells lining the bile ducts. The tumors, consisting of a significant amount of fibrous stroma, are classified as intrahepatic, extrahepatic, or hilar according to their anatomic location. Most common are the Klatskin tumors, originating from the confluence of the right and left hepatic ducts (1.Khan S.A. Davidson B.R. Goldin R. Pereira S.P. Rosenberg W.M. Taylor-Robinson S.D. Thillainayagam A.V. Thomas H.C. Thursz M.R. Wasan H. British SocietyGuidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: consensus document.Gut. 2002; 51: VI1-VI9Crossref PubMed Scopus (565) Google Scholar). Compared with other types of cancer, CCC is a relatively rare disease, accounting for about 3% of all gastrointestinal malignancies (2.Patel T. Cholangiocarcinoma.Nat. Clin. Pract. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2006; 3: 33-42Crossref PubMed Scopus (238) Google Scholar). However, its incidence is increasing, and as a result of poor patient outcomes it has overtaken hepatocellular carcinoma as the main cause of death from a primary hepatobiliary tumor (3.Khan S.A. Taylor-Robinson S.D. Toledano M.B. Beck A. Elliott P. Thomas H.C. Changing international trends in mortality rates for liver, biliary and pancreatic tumours.J. Hepatol. 2002; 37: 806-813Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (478) Google Scholar). Reasons for the high mortality rate (5-year survival rate of about 5%) (4.Lazaridis K.N. Gores G.J. Cholangiocarcinoma.Gastroenterology. 2005; 128: 1655-1667Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (401) Google Scholar) are the difficult diagnosis and limited treatment options. At present, extensive surgical resection of the extrahepatic bile ducts and parts of the liver or liver transplantation remain the only potentially curative treatment options, although most patients are considered inoperable at the time of diagnosis (5.Khan S.A. Thomas H.C. Davidson B.R. Taylor-Robinson S.D. Cholangiocarcinoma.Lancet. 2005; 366: 1303-1314Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (1007) Google Scholar). cholangiocellular carcinoma two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis area under the curve 4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase, mitochondrial apolipoprotein A-IV betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase 1 confidence interval fatty acid–binding protein 1 14-3-3 protein σ stress-induced phosphoprotein 1. cholangiocellular carcinoma two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis area under the curve 4-aminobutyrate aminotransferase, mitochondrial apolipoprotein A-IV betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase 1 confidence interval fatty acid–binding protein 1 14-3-3 protein σ stress-induced phosphoprotein 1. In general, the diagnosis of CCC is made based on histomorphological evaluation of core biopsies or cytological specimens. However, distinction between CCC and benign diseases such as reactive bile ductules or bile duct adenomas can be challenging when based on conventional histology alone. Additionally, it may be difficult to distinguish CCC from metastatic adenocarcinoma in the liver, especially when it originates from the pancreas like pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Therefore, specific immunohistochemical tissue markers for CCC would be highly beneficial for further validation of the diagnosis. In routine immunohistochemical diagnosis of CCC, so far, the detection of p53 (a product of a tumor suppressor gene) has proven useful, although its application is limited because of low sensitivity (6.Riener M.O. [Diagnosis of tumours of the liver and the biliary tract: new tissue and serum markers].Pathologe. 2011; 32: 304-309Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar). The cytokeratins Ck7, Ck8, Ck18, and Ck19 have been reported to have sensitivities of between 80% and 97% for CCC cells, but at low specificities and a similar expression as in non-tumorous cholangiocytes (7.Langer F. von Wasielewski R. Kreipe H.H. [The importance of immunohistochemistry for the diagnosis of cholangiocarcinomas].Pathologe. 2006; 27: 244-250PubMed Google Scholar). In addition, the tumor marker carcinoembryonic antigen, which is a commonly applied serum marker, has been used for immunohistochemical staining of CCC tissue. Although this was reported to be positive in 100% of the tested CCC sections, it also was immunoreactive in 60% of hepatocellular carcinomas (8.Balaton A.J. Nehama-Sibony P. between hepatocellular and metastatic carcinoma based on immunohistochemical staining for carcinoembryonic and for on PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). it has been that the protein may be for differential diagnosis of carcinoma (a of bile duct and only to this of CCC T. for protein and marker may be to carcinoma from and bile duct PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). immunohistochemical tumor markers specific for CCC therefore a types and have been in to The analysis of CCC for has to the identification of potential diagnostic and biomarker candidates P. A. identification of as a potential marker in PubMed Scopus Google P. A. of 1 and phosphoprotein in PubMed Scopus Google P. P. T. analysis of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In addition, have been used to proteins of the to H. H. T. T. T. protein as a tissue biomarker for of to treatment and in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Because from the in the the of patient can be The most of is tumor which in the has been analyzed via two-dimensional electrophoresis P. A. analysis of differentially proteins in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) and mass-spectrometry-based such as analysis tissue and p53 of primary liver 2011; PubMed Scopus (9) Google A.J. A. T. of cholangiocarcinoma: diagnostic potential of in malignant bile duct 2006; PubMed Scopus Google or H. F. of surgical PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). far, of the potential have been clinical that the application of two two-dimensional differential in-gel electrophoresis and mass-spectrometry-based label-free is an for the of novel biomarker candidates in hepatocellular carcinoma tissue T. F. between hepatocellular carcinoma and liver tissue by a and label-free Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). applied this as the for the of tissue markers that improve the differential diagnosis of CCC from benign bile duct In CCC tumor tissue was with non-tumorous liver tissue Because this types such as cholangiocytes, and tumor cells, an immunohistochemical determination of the cell-type-specific expression was for the most biomarker phosphoprotein the protein the specificity and sensitivity for CCC tumor cells, was as a biomarker candidate for CCC in a patient cohort liver tissue and cholangiocellular carcinoma tissue from CCC patients and was at the of of and The of the patients at the time of from to was from and the study to the of the of The the study were which was used for and label-free non-tumorous liver tissue and CCC tissue from eight patients between and were in the time from to used for immunohistochemical determination of cell-type-specific protein from 14 from 1. The from to at the time of with between and immunohistochemical from an cohort of 60 was patients were to and between and and immunohistochemical non-tumorous liver tissue and CCC tumor tissue were in and the the were on the and at was via on in and The was and the protein was via protein of protein was according to the tumorous and non-tumorous were with and of all was with for as an the and from patient were with the and were as T. F. between hepatocellular carcinoma and liver tissue by a and label-free Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). were on a at a of were and of to the in statistical analysis was with the of and resulted in a of proteins the protein in at of all p value of ≤ for the rate the of and and between experimental groups ≥ differentially proteins were from a two-dimensional and via from were to in-gel with and the were from the were on an were with the via The were with and as a of and a of with a were considered to be the and protein via have been A. A. of between carcinoma of the and Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). and are in the were a and for 1 at The proteins were with and in-gel The were via on in of in was by means of the were in The was via analysis on an with an with analysis was on an to an of in of were and on a for with at a rate of The was on an with a from to The rate was at and the was 60 The was in were at a of in the and of the most were in the by The label-free was by the data with The were and the most was as the to which the of the of all other were the of all only or were used for experimental between the the of were the have been T. F. between hepatocellular carcinoma and liver tissue by a and label-free Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). from were by the via The were and with to of and of The were with a rate of on the which was the in the data were In this was to a The data of the label-free analysis have been to the via the A. A. A. F. R. H. The and in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) with the and the protein only to protein the were The of all the as from a specific protein was used to the p value of and the change for The protein of was a p value ≤ rate the a and to R. Scholar) and an change were to be differentially with only by were from the of differential proteins were in to their was for and Text in the potential of to PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). with 1 from CCC and adjacent non-tumorous liver tissue were were and in at for immunohistochemical were with an staining the of the primary and the staining of the are in the were a were by or for an immunoreactive the of and for of an immunoreactive for immunohistochemical detection in cancer Google tissue was its staining 1 and and for the of positive cells 1 to to to and positive The was by two were The immunoreactive was by the staining by the of positive cells to tumor from hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, analysis was the A. F. an for and to and 2011; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). were with the confidence the of the as by the under two or a PubMed Scopus Google In to the diagnostic of the candidates and the most for validation in a sensitivity and specificity were at the for was as the of with positive staining of the and specificity was as the of positive staining of other cells. is in to for staining of and to for with staining and with used which is to the of the of sensitivity and In the of an the with the specificity was the of sensitivity and specificity at the confidence were as well the Although to diagnostic are for were used for verification in to the were for the with hepatocytes and and diagnostic were with an of in CCC cells. This study at the identification of novel diagnostic biomarker candidates for cholangiocellular carcinoma two and mass-spectrometry-based label-free to the protein expression profile of CCC tumor tissue in to that of non-tumorous liver tissue After an evaluation of the biomarker candidates were by The cell-type-specific expression was in a cohort from 14 patients the most candidate was in a cohort of 60 patients The is in 1. the protein in at of all from to In were differential between the two experimental groups p ≤ ≥ After from a protein to were via proteins were and were in CCC tissue relative to and between The were also analyzed via label-free to the data of could be In to a also the tumor from the in this label-free in with of or were After the were to to the identification of proteins After proteins that were with only found proteins to be regulated p ≤ change ≥ of were and in CCC tissue. In the protein from both a of differential proteins were with found in the and only in the label-free study proteins were found to be differential of the applied most of the proteins from the of both the were and the via and label-free were found to be highly two proteins 1 and were reported with in the and label-free The determination of protein a amount of and proteins by label-free by In the a amount of proteins was In to candidates for the immunohistochemical The which for the label-free was by the in was the and the of protein H. T. F. data for PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the confidence of the identification and of was and about which proteins be This which proteins have been as with CCC, other types of cancer, or other liver the of also was an After 14 which are in were chosen for determination of the specificity via biomarker candidates chosen for verification by in protein protein phosphoprotein in aminotransferase, S-methyltransferase acid–binding in a new liver which was used as tissue in the is a of types hepatocytes but hepatic cells, cells, cells, and The are the of CCC Therefore, this study a determination of the cell-type-specific expression of candidate between the identification and the the aim was to for the of tumorous cells from non-tumorous cholangiocytes and hepatocytes and the differentiation of CCC from benign bile duct from 14 patients from was with 14 candidate The evaluation of staining and the amount of cells was CCC tumor cells, and non-tumorous The for the and sensitivities and specificities are in and a all confidence and can be found in the is to that the diagnostic are because of the However, can be used to the The that was from was and used as a for the This that the diagnostic for were verification of 14 potential biomarker in a new of the 14 tested protein and were considered for further because of sensitivity or specificity especially the evaluation CCC cells to cholangiocytes In the of for the of tumorous cells and a sensitivity of was at 100% the which is to this means that hepatocytes and CCC cells were to a similar In the of tumorous to non-tumorous cholangiocytes, in diagnostic were The proteins that were found to be in CCC H1, and a specificity of 100% for the differentiation of CCC from both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes, with high sensitivities between and Because candidates that were as in CCC tissue in the study can be to be in the sensitivity to the staining and of hepatocytes. This was 100% for mitochondrial and and for mitochondrial The specificity in the of in which tumorous cells were and mitochondrial was specific with and mitochondrial only of the most serpin H1, and in the label-free and and immunohistochemical staining are in and In addition, the expression of proteins in the immunohistochemistry all 14 tested all other can be found in the of biomarker candidates by immunohistochemical staining of CCC tumor tissue and non-tumorous liver tissue from the an an staining of CCC tumor tissue in of some hepatocytes and cells was whereas non-tumorous cholangiocytes and hepatocytes whereas cholangiocytes and tissue and tumorous tissue was detectable in hepatocytes or bile but it was in CCC cells. was only to the of malignant cells and to cells of liver tissue. In tumorous the in CCC cells but in tumorous tissue was the expression of candidate all 14 tested patients in CCC tumor cells, hepatocytes and cholangiocytes based on the immunoreactive At this the most candidate for further was with 100% sensitivity and specificity for CCC cells in the 14 tested Therefore, a cohort 60 patient was and tested for expression by immunohistochemistry that were were applied to the evaluation of to 60 could be tumor and and were for cholangiocytes and hepatocytes two for sensitivity and In the specificity was 100% with a confidence interval of to 100% and a sensitivity of to In the of cholangiocytes, specificity was high to and sensitivity to clinical a would be In with the value of in a specificity of 98% to and sensitivity of when both hepatocytes and cholangiocytes in diagnosis of CCC because patients only in an of the such as and that are used in the evaluation of primary hepatic have low In some the of the serum marker can further although its sensitivity and specificity for CCC are also diagnosis is therefore T. Gores G.J. diagnosis and of Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2011; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). Because this is the identification of novel for the immunohistochemical diagnosis of CCC is an could the diagnosis of CCC and its differentiation from benign bile duct diseases such as reactive bile duct as well as metastatic malignancies such as pancreatic ductal which are so difficult to distinguish from Therefore, in this tumorous and non-tumorous tissue were by means of the and a label-free The aim of for the of novel biomarker candidates was to to improve the of significant as well as to of candidates were found to be differentially with both proteins both the of from the two the of both of proteins when both This could have been due to the detection of in and label-free it is to distinguish between of protein for a are are of protein are to a change and p In the and due to tissue could be and the to distinguish non-tumorous from tumorous cholangiocytes is a for a CCC Therefore, verification by immunohistochemistry was a The immunohistochemical was by two analyzed only the types of in the tissue cells in the tumor hepatocytes and cholangiocytes in the non-tumorous of immunohistochemical was an immunoreactive This is especially for the analysis of tumor tissue such as In to the for the immunoreactive from and a of the of cells with of was chosen in to between staining a from the immunohistochemical of the tested candidate proteins should be considered as potentially for the diagnosis of are serpin H1, and The most of is also as This is a of and that in a of such as protein and and an PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). an immunohistochemical study of tumor has that as a biomarker in cancer A. H.H. stress-induced as a biomarker in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). is to to the protein to the and of of This cancer in malignancies A. stress-induced phosphoprotein 1 the and of cancer Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the up-regulation of in CCC cells by this also be in CCC tumor Because a high specificity of 98% for CCC cells when to both hepatocytes and non-tumorous cholangiocytes in the verification tissue sections from 60 patients and a sensitivity of on the CCC was conclude that is a biomarker candidate for In for the tumor marker p53 an immunohistochemical study in positive staining in only of and of extrahepatic bile duct Although in this non-tumorous cholangiocytes were of bile duct cells p53 protein (6.Riener M.O. [Diagnosis of tumours of the liver and the biliary tract: new tissue and serum markers].Pathologe. 2011; 32: 304-309Crossref PubMed Scopus (9) Google Scholar). The that was in all CCC tumor the of this In this to a of when as a biomarker for of its sensitivity and specificity to be further in validation an could be the of in an immunohistochemical biomarker panel. to a can improve the diagnostic relative to that of proteins from this study could also to such a biomarker panel. for which is in a of high diagnostic in the immunohistochemical evaluation of This protein is to be an protein in cancer types H. M.R. of at the 14-3-3 to in PubMed Scopus Google H. F. H. T. H. T. T. of and of expression of the 14-3-3 in hepatocellular PubMed Scopus Google H. F. T. H. of the 14-3-3 is with in Google H. T. H. T. T. and of in 2002; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). In an immunohistochemical study its expression in of tested of was only in and in normal bile duct cells A. T. the and its is with poor in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). This is in with and the of the and applied this A. T. the and its is with poor in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) that expression is a significant of poor in In this protein be used as a biomarker for CCC, and its to in it be a potential further In 100% sensitivity for CCC cells was for the protein serpin H1, also as or is to be in and of and of the of as a for the and of Google A. proteins which or Full Text PDF PubMed Google Scholar). in diseases with such as T. protein expression in serum PubMed Scopus Google A. T. of and protein in Google and liver H. of the protein and the and in liver Clin. PubMed Scopus Google T. of protein in PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) has been In CCC, this the of the tumor In expression of serpin is an of in all of tissue. it to be specific for CCC, but it the differential diagnosis of CCC and benign of liver or bile duct cells. a that is to be in and of in and 32: PubMed Scopus Google was in CCC tissue in Although immunohistochemical verification in significant in staining of CCC cells and based on its in CCC cells relative to normal cholangiocytes, has potential to in biomarker main is the differentiation of CCC from benign of cholangiocytes, of tumorous from non-tumorous bile duct cells is of importance that of CCC cells from hepatocytes. from the are in most on the of In combination with other could be especially when with proteins that expression in normal liver tissue in CCC in study are and also or fatty In with has been as in hepatocytes A. G.J. fatty protein as a serum marker of hepatocellular in liver 2002; PubMed Scopus Google but also in the A. and fatty protein in the and clinical PubMed Scopus Google Scholar) and the types of fatty protein in and PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). a in the has been to be most in the liver, at on the F. and tissue of 4-aminobutyrate PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). which from via in the and the liver detection of betaine-homocysteine S-methyltransferase in and liver and PubMed Scopus Google for to of the protein in the liver and of betaine-homocysteine Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). expression have been reported in hepatocellular carcinoma relative to normal liver tissue in T. F. between hepatocellular carcinoma and liver tissue by a and label-free Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google A. H. of the main in in liver and hepatocellular Hepatol. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma by two-dimensional electrophoresis and 2005; PubMed Scopus Google H. F. analysis of hepatocellular carcinoma by two-dimensional novel protein markers in hepatocellular carcinoma Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar). the immunohistochemical staining of tissue a for T. F. between hepatocellular carcinoma and liver tissue by a and label-free Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google whereas CCC at In addition, and also be used to from hepatocytes from of other such as the bile ducts. In malignant cells, a of are The proteins and in this study some of the that are in tumorous bile duct tissue. serpin H1, have a marker for the of the tumor cells that to the of high of of to in and the that tumor cells was confirmed by the up-regulation of and The of proteins as for CCC be tested in We the of as of a biomarker to the diagnosis of CCC in The of serpin H1, and is by the although it further only biopsies are the distinction of CCC from reactive bile ducts can be challenging when on In to CCC, reactive bile ductules are found in liver biopsies due to or extrahepatic bile duct diseases or found adjacent to malignant due to bile biomarker all or some of the candidates could in this the combination of proteins specific for CCC cells and specific for hepatocytes can be especially We and for their as well as for the in and the data to the with
43
pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves
Xavier Robin, Natacha Turck, Alexandre Hainard et al. · BMC Bioinformatics · 2011 · 14K citations · Full text