Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology · 2014 · 15 citations · 28 references
DentistryPeriodonticsSurgeryMicrosurgeryBarrier MembranesPeriapical SurgeryBarrier Membrane DesignClinical Effectiveness CriteriaClinical Effectiveness MeasurementIntrabony DefectsOrbital PeriosteumPeriosteal Barrier MembranesPeriosteal Patch Technique
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of periosteum as a barrier membrane for the treatment of intrabony defects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was conducted in patients having bilateral intrabony defects. A total of 20 intrabony defects in 10 patients were treated, out of which 10 defects received periosteal barrier and the other 10 defects received conventional open flap debridement procedure. The efficacy of the treatment was assessed using clinical parameters and dentascan. RESULTS: Statistically significant gain in clinical attachment level (CAL) was found in the test group (2.00 ± 0.26 mm) as compared to the control group (0.60 ± 0.22 mm). In both the treatment modalities (test and control groups), a significant decrease in probing pocket depth of 3.90 ± 0.35 mm and 2.90 ± 0.31 mm was observed, respectively. The difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Bone defect fill was 1.40 ± 0.16 mm for the test group and 0.90 ± 0.18 mm for the control group, but the difference observed was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The results of this study show that periosteal barrier membrane can be a better alternative of barrier membranes for the treatment of intrabony defects.
28
New attachment following surgical treatment of human periodontal disease
Sture Nyman, Jan Lindhe, Thorkild Karring et al. · Journal Of Clinical Periodontology · 1982 · 1.1K citations
Jan Lindhe, Sture Nyman · Journal Of Clinical Periodontology · 1975 · 518 citations