Current Research in Nutrition and Food Science Journal · 2013 · 58 citations · 6 references
Public HealthPublic Health NutritionEpidemiologyHuman NutritionObesity PreventionAnthropometric VariationBody CompositionObesity Prevention PolicyEthnic Differences In ObesityObesity ScreeningObesity-associated Risk AssessmentWaist Circumference MeasurementWaist-to-hip Ratio
This review focuses on the potential drawbacks of using body mass index (BMI) which are often overlooked in the assessment of overweight or obesity risk, with special emphasis on the use of other equally important anthropometric measurements such as waist circumference (WC), waist-hip-ratio (WHR) and skin-fold thicknesses. There have been inconsistencies in findings when using BMI as an indicator of obesity risk. These have arisen mainly due to gender, age and ethnic differences in body fat composition and distribution coupled with increased reliance on self-reported values of weight and height. Since BMI remains the most widely used tool to screen obesity risk in many studies, establishment of gender-, age- and ethnicity-based cut-offs of BMI, tailored to specific populations, will significantly enhance public health policies and increase the success rates of obesity intervention programs. The use of other anthropometric measures such as WC and WHR in conjunction with BMI is also highly recommended to assess abdominal obesity or other body-specific areas.
6
Body Mass Index and Survival in Men and Women Aged 70 to 75
Leon Flicker, Kieran McCaul, Graeme J. Hankey et al. · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2010 · 226 citations · Full text
Muhammad Umair Mushtaq, Sibgha Gull, Hussain Muhammad Abdullah et al. · BMC Pediatrics · 2011 · 109 citations · Full text
Chandrasekharan Nair Kesavachandran, Vipin Bihari, Neeraj Mathur · The Indian Journal of Medical Research · 2012 · 57 citations · Full text