The Journal of Laryngology & Otology · 2009 · 10 citations · 14 references
Health ProfessionsAudiologyOtolaryngologyAural RehabilitationHealth Services ResearchHearing AidsAuditory RehabilitationHearing Aid FittingHearing ImpairmentHearing LossAdult Hearing Aid FittingHearing Aid Benefit AssessmentHearing Aid Benefit MeasurementHearing Aid BenefitsHearing Aid EvaluationHearing Aid FitQuestionnaire AdministrationSatisfaction
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to ascertain the usefulness of the bone-anchored hearing aid and its impact on the quality of life of patients fitted in Glasgow between 1996 and 2006. METHOD: The Entific Medical Systems questionnaire and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory were posted to patients in order to assess their satisfaction and quality of life changes. RESULTS: Sixty adult patients were identified, with a questionnaire response rate of 63 per cent. Thirty-two respondents (85 per cent) reported using their bone-anchored hearing aid for more than eight hours per day. Twenty-nine respondents (75 per cent) found their bone-anchored hearing aid to be generally better than their previous, conventional aid. Twenty-seven respondents (71 per cent) reported that their bone-anchored hearing aid improved their quality of life. The median total Glasgow Benefit Inventory score was +33.3. CONCLUSIONS: Bone-anchored hearing aid usage rates and satisfaction levels were high amongst patients in Glasgow. Glasgow Benefit Inventory indices were comparable to published findings from other centres. Despite this, bone-anchored hearing aid funding is still not universally available within the National Health Service in Scotland.
14