Dual Role Relationships: What Makes Them So Problematic?

Karen Strohm Kitchener

Journal of Counseling & Development · 1988 · 192 citations · 19 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The author argues that all dual‑role relationships, not only those involving sexual contact, may be ethically problematic. The study offers three guidelines to distinguish high‑risk dual‑role relationships from lower‑risk ones, arguing that ethical prohibitions should increase with the risk of harm. The guidelines are based on three mechanisms—greater expectation incompatibility, diverging obligations, and unequal power and prestige—each raising the potential for harm, loss of objectivity, and exploitation.

Abstract

The author argues that all dual role relationships, not only those involving sexual contact, may be ethically problematic. Three guidelines are offered to differentiate between relationships that have a high probability of leading to harm and those that do not. First, as the incompatibility of expectations increases between roles, so will the potential for harm. Second, as the obligations associated with different roles diverge, the potential for loss of objectivity and divided loyalties increases. Third, as the power and prestige between the professional's and consumer's roles increase, so does the potential for exploitation. Last, it is argued that, as the risks of harm increase, so should the ethical prohibitions about engaging in the relationship.

References

19